For context, I’m on an iPhone using Firefox. I can’t use uBlock Origin, but am ready to block on the DNS level after this.

      • TodaviaTyler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can only save 20 recipes before you have to pay, but you can view as many as you like without saving them. Still, a very nice app IMO.

        • Adam Kempenich ✅ @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you’re using the app on a device, you can open links directly in it. So, if you have a bookmarks folder of recipes, you can just use your browser’s share button -> Open In -> Just the Recipe

          I’ll sound like an old man, but I miss the days of going to a website and not having to deal with the SEO junk.

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      theres also cooked.wiki. tack “cooked.wiki/“ onto the start of a recipe URL and it scrapes and reformats for you

    • Scroll Responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What a sad state of affairs that such a site is even necessary. The internet was supposed to make finding information easier, not some increasingly kafkaesque tug of war.

      Thank you for posting that though. It should come in handy.

  • nfsu2@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    ah yes, a $1500 phone with software that won’t allow you to do shit under the flag of security and UI.

    • kalpol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re all headed that way. And Google wants to do it to PCs too.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Safari allows you to install adblockers, btw. Apple is overprotective but this isn’t really their fault.

      • nfsu2@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you are only concerned about blocking ads thats fine and good. But if your are concerned about privacy one should ditch apple devices altogether. Not to mention freedom.

          • nfsu2@feddit.cl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            How is it worse? If you use google apps it is obiously the same as using apple apps. But otherwise you can remove telemetry, use foss apps and if you are up to it patch a safey net fix to use banking apps.

              • nfsu2@feddit.cl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                A closed source OS of a company that has broken every anti-trust law, thats sells phones with no headphone jack or charger and calls it features and you tell me it does not sell data. Google and Apple are two of the same Monster. But you can not modify you Iphone whatsoever, Jailbreaking an Iphone is a pain in the ass, while in Android isnt a breeze either it is much easier. Android in it self (Android Open Source Project) kicks any iOS in the ass. The problem is that vendors put a thick layer of their version of android. If you get your hands on a phone that is compatible with Lineage Os (very close to (AOSP) you can escape Googles jail for good. And while agree with tou that Google’s Android is bad it ia certainly not any worse than iOS. Do not take my word for it, just ask any developer.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    All people said not to mention that recipe is unnecessarily complex.

    Refrigerating the dough for an entire week will make it rather less potent, not more, while most of aroma components accumulation will happen through the first day. Not to mention here you allow it to stay at room temperature for 8 hours first before that, which is an overkill.

    Just keep it at room temperature for 2 hours, let it stay in your fridge for 24 hours and you’re good to go. Or just use the sourdough directly, that’ll do.

    Also, I hope you had at least 3 days (better a week for wild starters) of renewing the sourdough before you put it anywhere. Otherwise, it can have a very unstable and potentially even dangerous microbial composition.

    Source: I’m a bread technologist.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, most of my sources are either in Russian or very academic. This open-access article does a good job of reviewing many academic sources, if you’re interested.

        Out of what’s popular and available in English, I’d strongly recommend Jeffrey Hamelman’s “Bread: A Baker’s Book of Techniques and Recipes”. It contains a lot of useful info on both sourdough and straight dough technology in a way that is home baker-friendly.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Talk to the mother or grandmother of any Indian origin person in your friends’ circle

    • arvere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I found after years that starters work fine if I leave them in the fridge without feeding (sometimes for weeks) and then prepare and feed them overnight or 1 day before using it.

      would you say that’s dangerous?

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Depends on whether you allowed your starter to go through 2-3 cycles before putting it in the fridge. If yes, you’re all clear. Essentially what protects starters and sourdough from going bad is high acidity that they develop. If you give your starter enough time before preserving it, it will retain most of that acidity, allowing you to just feed it again and then use it. If not, you’re at risk of letting molds and other harmful organisms develop - some of them do grow at fridge temperatures, and if there’s no acidity to stop them, it can be not good.

        Anyway, it’s a good practice not to store sourdough for over a week - just in case.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    I legitimately thought this was satire

    Are things really this bad without an ad blocker these days?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes. For a long time I was trying to “play nice” and not go adblock. I didn’t mind ads that were unobtrusive and figured I’d roll with the ads for the sake of the sites. With things looking like this, and deliberately having ads load a little late and relayout the page to replace a link just as you were about to click in it, and ones that slipped even the pretense and pop up and ad instead of the actual link or button the first time. I would tend to just close such sites in disgust, and told my Google feed to not give me contemt from a couple of the worst owners that recurred.

      The final straw was a site that made the play embedded video function be ads the first two times on clicking it, as well as looking like that. On top of just having to give up on sites more and more.

      I read that majority of Internet users now use ad blockers. That didn’t used to be the case, and the large chunk of sites like this I’m sure is why.

  • Sips'@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I low-key find it more infuriating that you’re not using an adblocker…

      • Sips'@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can still block ads on a DNS level. Simply add, base.dns.mullvad.net as your primary DNS Server and that should do you a lot of good just there. I’m sure there are additional steps one could take as an iPhone user though.

        • Armand1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I didn’t know Mullvad did a DNS service as well as a VPN, let alone that it has some ad blocking profiles. Thanks for that!

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This must be done at each network’s settings doesn’t it? At least I can’t see an option in iOS to use a DNS system wide, like we have in Android.

          • Sips'@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Don’t have an IPhone so wouldn’t know, but that does seem annoying indeed. It is possible to just change your DNS on the router instead. And or use a VPN that also includes a different DNS.

      • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is, though. Safari has native support for 3rd party adblockers, it’s just that many people don’t know. AdGuard is one of the good options. Safari is doing the actual blocking for the most part (the extension just hands over the filterlists), but nowadays some of the adblockers include an optional extension that applies some rules for complex ads that are not supported by the Apple API, such as on YouTube. As an end user you just have to install and enable the adblocker.

        Then there are also other browsers available with built-in adblockers. Admittedly those are all limited in some ways because they’re forced to use the same browser engine (outside of the EU), but they are very effective at blocking ads.

        • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve used AdBlock Plus or Brave Browser on iOS, is this better for security on a sketchy site I might accidentally encounter?

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        How is that not easy? Just install an adblocker from the App Store, there are plenty of options.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Magic Lasso. Ghostery. Both decent ad blockers for iOS.

        And if you’re using the built in web browser, there’s reader mode that gets rid of most of this crap.

      • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I use AdGuard pro it makes a local VPN to block ads similar to blokada or dns66 on android

        • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve used this for several months and just switched to Mullvad DNS. It blocked ads on pretty much everything. Between that, using a VPN, and uBlock on Firefox, my mobile browsing experience is pretty nice.

        • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not real FF. iOS forces all mobile browsers to use safari under the hood, though that was just made illegal in the EU, so there’s changes coming.

        • GloriousGherkins@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m using Firefox in the picture. Add-ons aren’t allowed on iOS though, otherwise I would have all of these blocked.

          • SKBo@lu.skbo.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Orion allows you to install extensions. It works so-so, but that’s a first step.

  • DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Edit: this is what it looks like with adblocker on. iPad mini 5 with LockDown app, and raspberry pi running pihole.

    If ads annoy you as much as they annoy me, get an adblocker. But if there are sites that you use regularly, and block ads on, you might consider contributing to their patreon or whatever.

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I recently switched from iPhone to Android, and let me tell you it is ridiculous how much more control you have over your user experience. Adblock alone made it worthwhile.

    Anyway, on iPhone i used to use reader mode to filter all that crap. Though some asshole sites block the function

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Anyway, on iPhone i used to use reader mode to filter all that crap.

      Why not just use an adblocker?

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Weird, because the adblocker on my iPhone seems to be working perfectly.

          iPhone has had support for ad blockers since 2015.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            How so? All Browsers on ios are just skins for safari. Unless you are counting jailbreaking the device first

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              So? Safari has had built in adblocker support since iOS 9.

              I use AdGuard myself and it works flawlessly.

              • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Just dug around the Safari settings on my (fairly old) device, i cant seem to find any extensions or addons. Though i believe you of course, a quick web search suggests so too. Perhaps my device isnt supporting them, its an old iphone x i think (or 8?)

                • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  You need to install an ad blocker from the app store. This one works well for me.

                  Start the app to select the blocking rulesets

                  Enable it in Settings > Safari > Extensions and Settings > Safari > Content blockers

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I used ddg and no ad blocker*, never was an issue until ddg on Android.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Firefox has a reader mode built in. Works in mobile too. I assume it’s very similar to this, it just cuts out an extra step.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    I use an app called Recipe Keeper. It’s amazing because I just share the page to the app, it extracts the recipe without any nonsense, and now I have a copy for later if I want to reuse it. I literally never bother scrolling recipe pages because of how terrible they all are, and I decide in the app if the recipe is one I want to keep.

    It also bypasses paywalls and registration requirements for many sites because the recipe data is still on the page for crawlers even if it’s not rendered for a normal visitor.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, that’s fine, but at some point we need to start talking about alternative methods of monetization for websites. On the one hand, compiling a list of recipies on a website and maintaining that website is not easy or cheap and the owners should be able to make money out of it. On the other hand, the user should be able to pay for this comfortably and have a nice experience on the website.

      This ad model doesn’t serve any of the two, business or consumer.

        • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, but paid content is not the norm and the reason for that is that blatant advertising and shoving malaware down people’s throats on grandma’s recipe website is not only legal, it’s a predictable business model.

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure, I agree.

        Unfortunately, no such solution currently exists or has been widely adopted.

    • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      My recipe box is another app that does the same thing. I haven’t looked at a recipe website in ages