• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not a real Internet service until it has furries on it.

  • peef ಠ_ಠ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do people forget that Meta is primarily an advertisement company. Each and every one of their platforms is made purely for data harvesting. Of course it would be sanitised for the advertisers.

    Also it’s an half baked app which was made in a hurry and it’s just opportunistic.

  • RemeJuan@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does nobody check the permission requirements before installing the app that quite literally steals all their data. Like every data tracking option including “other” is selected by the app, it’s so invasive they cannot launch in Europe, but people are choosing to install it?

    • gkd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea the fact this cannot even be released in the EU is one of the biggest red flags I have ever seen yet loads of people seem to not care at all. 🤷‍♂️

      • Bosa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep agreed. EU is doing good work with there privacy stuff (of course things can always be better). If they can expand on it and make things even more strict that’s good to.

        If only North America would follow. But ya if it’s not installable in EU do you really want to install it? It’s alo Meta who legit would ask for your blood eveyweek if they could.

        No thanks.

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let me preface this by saying that I hate Facebook just as much as other people. But this is partially false, they just haven’t been approved to release there YET getting that approval takes time. Time that Facebook didn’t have if they wanted to release quickly.

        • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No approval is needed to launch a service in Europe. Them not launching simply means they know it is not regulation compliant.

        • shinjiikarus@mylem.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anyone can release an app in Europe no prior approval required. I’m using over 250 apps currently on my phone and have used thousands others in the past. All of these apps either operated inside the law or at least “pending a lawsuit”, as is customary in silicon valley. The chances of this lawsuit materializing and Facebook thinking it would lose this hypothetical lawsuit must be astronomical if they chose not to launch.

        • gkd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No that’s fair. You’re right that it isn’t being actively blocked or anything, but Facebook themselves have not launched it because they know the privacy issues are pretty big and they could easily run afoul of the law there.

          Obviously not to say they never will launch there, but I’d imagine there’s some significant changes that need to be made before that’s allowed.

          Regardless, only time will tell, and I’m sure Facebook won’t lose the opportunity to expand. And like you said, time definitely played a part in this, I’m sure given more time we would have seen a launch all at once.

  • small44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand people obsession with nudity on general-purpose social media

    • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m here for my hobbies, which typically don’t involve naked people. I liked tumblr back in the day because of the really strong underground music scene on it, but it just vanished all at once when they changed the rules. Really bummed me out since I made some good friends and was able to promote my music really well there.

    • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, its because its the canary. If no porn, then probably too corporate for real discussion

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand people’s obsession with assuming that having a passing interest in something society frowns upon means they’re obsessed with it.

      I doubt it would overwhelm threads in any meaningful way, unless it just happened to have a perfect storm of features that appealed to pornographers. So their view that “You can’t do that! It’s not right!” seems like they’re not really aiming to make a service that people can use… but a product they can sell to advertisers. Not that I doubted that anyone thought it’d be any different.

      The thing is, you can have both. You just have to not go whole hog on either. You have to find a middle ground.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Making a big deal of a platform that doesn’t want to have nude content on it when there are multiple other places where you can post nudity is obsessive

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is discussion such a disgusting topic to you that any time someone does it you break out in hives?

          Talking about something doesn’t mean its an obsession, just a topic of interest. Just because you don’t take issue with it doesn’t mean it’s not worth discussing.

  • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love that this is the actual title of the article, lol.

    So, it sounds like the real Twitter killer will be BlueSky (if they allow NSFW).

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah Bluesky allows NSFW and is pretty great, the only issue is that they’re currently restricting it to a tiny number of users. Hopefully people people get annoyed at threads over time and are eager to rush to Bluesky when it becomes available rather than just getting used to the problems.

  • oatmilkmaid@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know about everyone else but my timeline (?) on Threads is all men posting their ass on main. Not sure how strong the guidelines are being enforced at this point, but I’m not complaining.

  • Poob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Real talk, is WhatsApp more than just a text message replacement to people? I see it get brought up in talks about social media and I get very confused.

  • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Forget the porn, no corporate can ever have safe harbor for my desire of sailing in the high seas. No I will not download your app, but I will download a car, and torrents.