He doesn’t support women’s health.
Kristi, he’d grind you and every woman up into hamburger and feed it to your surviving dogs if it got him one more vote so he could avoid prison for four more years. Give it up.
I think you meant “hamberders”
I think he should pick Airbud to show he supports canine health.
“There’s nothing in the rules that says a dog can’t be vice president”
- SCOTUS, soon
Obviously would have to be 35 dog years old, but that shouldn’t be a problem
Actually, is there such a requirement for VP? You don’t have to meet the requirements to be in the chain of succession, you just get skipped.
There is. The Twelfth Amendment explicitly says that the Vice President must meet the same eligibility requirements to become President. Which, as it currently stands, means at least 35 years old, a natural born citizen, and resided in the US for the last 14 years.
Ah, and so Air Bud’s VP prospects have been sadly dashed.
Turns out there is a rule.
We’re talking about dogs here. Do you seriously think we could skip a good boy?
He should choose to kill himself to show that he supports humanity’s health.
I mean, he’s trying. You’ve seen his diet…
McDonald’s and Ozempic, the breakfast of champions.
If he chooses a female VP, he will take the blonde with the big tits and personally verified blowjob qualities.
Are you suggesting that his idiot lawyer during his trial could give good blowjobs? Because of her skill is a lawyer is anything to go by, she’s not good at anything.
I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that her advice happens to be self-serving. Yup, total coincidence.
Trump would choose dog health over women’s health.
You’re SOL Noem. Give it up…
I don’t know, he really hates both. I’m not sure which he hates more.
Trump would only choose his own health and let everyone else die but it’s a sacrifice he is willing to make.jpg
So would I, honestly. Over mens health too, for that matter.
They can always dust off Palin. That worked so well the first time.
Last time it was at odds with the presidential candidate. This time they both would fit right in with each other.
But it will also show he doesn’t support animal health.
Well I mean we already know that he doesn’t like pets and animals hate him. So it would be in character. But he would have to make it a crime somehow for it to really make sense.
lol. lmao. Dare I say, ROFLCOPTER.
Them some crazy eyes, boy.
Don’t be messin’ with women with eyes like that.
‘Just pick a woman’ got the Democrats Kamala Harris. Picking candidates based on their sex is not a great idea and is literally the purest definition of sexism.
I by no means love Kamala Harris, but she’s not “just a woman,” she was a strong candidate period.
She’s not generally popular, she’d get badly wiped on the top of the ticket by pretty much anybody.
Turnout among black women was very high and very democratic in 2020, she might have been important in making that happen.
she was a strong candidate period
She has a negative 11% approval rating, nobody likes her. She is a fucking awful candidate who did terribly in the 2020 primaries and continues to become more unpopular.
You are correct that Kamala wasn’t purely chosen because she’s a woman - she was chosen as a concession to Hillary as she’s her protégé.
Harris’s checkered past as a prosecutor and lack of communication skills make her an exceptionally poor choice for the executive.
Copmala Harris was a perfect match for Student Loan Joe
Write better.
“The reason”? Really? There are no other reasons? Lol. US post-secondary funding is a joke, but within the confines of the US approach if that rule wasn’t in place then no loans would ever be possible for college education since college students typically have few assets anyways and could just declare bankruptcy after graduation. A good reason why forcing young people to take on debt for post secondary education in the first place is stupid, but that rule is what makes the current system, flawed as it is, work to any degree.
before the privatization of Sallie Mae, post-secondary education was somewhat affordable in the US (limiting itself more to racial discrimination) – after the privatization, they started raising the rates of student loans, became a collector of student loans, started subsidizing loans offered directly from the institutions which allowed post-secondary institutions to raise their fees through the roof driving people into bankruptcy
Still doesn’t prove what you said but hey, you typed words so I guess that counts for something.
Question: Do you think such silly nicknames help or hurt your argument?
