Will people here use/try Meta’s #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.
The amount of data collected is insane imo.
You must log in or register to comment.
Definitely not. I didn’t come to the Fediverse to be under social media companies again.
Almost same take here - but I also understand that there may be some people which would use/try it for whatever reasons.
They can try all day. I will not. Mastodon it is for me.
Never. Fuck Meta. Fuck Zuckerberg.
The amount of data collected is so insane that it won’t come out in the EU for now. And I like it that way.
It doesn’t have to come to EU to get this data though, all it has to do is start federating. I’m really curious how is that all going to work out, legally speaking.
Not totally true, the real value is combining data from different sources, but since the data they get wont have your email /ip/device/contacts etc it will be a lot harder to harvest usefully for advertising. Maybe they will figure out things to use it, but what they can use is already quite public, so they don’t really need to federatie for that
Now these are news for me, thanks for the info.
Privacy-wise, I already use Facebook, WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram, and I’m pretty sure that Mark Zuckerberg knows everything that he’d ever want to know about me. I largely believe in the conspiracy theory that Meta actively listens in on users in some way to serve them ads and targeted content, even if the evidence is circumstantial at best.
Despite this, would I still use Threads? Probably not.
Microblogging isn’t my thing. 140 characters is nowhere near enough space to articulate your thoughts and it feels like the site was originally designed around SMS text message limitations more than anything. I also don’t like how the only way you can get any genuine interaction on places like Twitter or even Mastodon is to be a celebrity.
I do agree that we should collectively defederate Threads much in the same way that everybody on the fediverse collectively blacklisted Gab, not necessarily as a fuck-you to Zuckerberg, but because a flood of Instagram normies would completely cripple other instances with traffic.
I stay the fuck away from anything Meta/Facebook, so absolutely not.
My brother in Christ, you’re asking people on Lemmy if they’re going to try meta spyware
We need to let meta die slowly, so no.
I was curious how it compared to Mastodon. It didn’t.
Nah, fuck that and fuck them
Exactly
I’ll try it. I don’t really care about data privacy very much and neither do a lot of other people until the data receiver is someone they dislike.
How much data is Reddit, Tumblr, Uber, Snapchat, WhatsApp, AirBnB or any other app getting? Who cares as long as I don’t hate their CEO.
This is a pretty moronic take. “All of these other companies have already stolen my privacy, so what’s one more? It’s not like this specific company has helped undermine democracy in a world superpower the last two elections!”
There it is. It’s not about the data - it’s political.
One has a lot to do with the other lmao. Yeah, I don’t like any companies that undermine democratic elections. Do you?
I think it’s exciting. I don’t hate Twitter, but a competitor with big money back in that’s potentially going to integrate with the fediverse? That’s fucking exciting.
Will they actively contribute or fork it? Who knows.
They will actively contribute while growing their userbase. When they hit critical mass they will cutoff the fediverse and take their users and their content with them. It happened before.
“Attract and extract”
no definitely not installing it or opening an account.
I’m not against federation tho, I’d be in favour of showing people you can get all the same content through another channel. defederating means that people will have to use it if there’s content from someone they like on there. I don’t want to give people a reason to install that shit.
deleted by creator
Not touching that, nope.
no
Thanks to @m0bi13 who posted this breakdown for context :
Data collected by #threads:
-
Health & Fitness -
Financial info -
Contact info -
User content -
Browsing History -
Usage Data -
Diagnostics -
Purchases -
Location -
Contacts -
Search history -
Identifiers -
Sensitive Info -
Other Data
Oh fuck no. The very first line is basically a HIPAA violation. It gets worse from there. We require less disclosure from Supreme Court Justices and Presidential nominees.
This is a trainwreck waiting to happen - even if Facebook itself doesn’t abuse this level of power, you know that bad actors within the organization will. And once the information is collected, you know that tyrannical governments all over the world will be falling over themselves to get access to the data. This is a stalker’s wetdream, an Orwellian orgasm of truly grotesque proportions.
Keep the Fediverse from Zucking. Just say no to Threads.
-
