• MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 months ago

    Confusion like this got me my current job. They were looking for somebody with experience in “Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager”, and I look that up and I’m like “Oh, that’s SCCM, I do that”. Go through the interview process they keep asking me if I know Endpoint Configuration Manager and I’m like “yeah, for sure”. I get the job. Day one, the other systems engineer is like “here is the link to our Endpoint Manager Tenant”, and I’m like “oh… Shit I have never ever used this”

    Well… Ends up Endpoint Configuration Manager and Endpoint Manager are two different things. Fortunately for me they are pretty similar in function and rely on knowledge of Windows and Powershell, which I know.

    So my first 2 weeks of work was taking a shitload of courses in Endpoint Manager and watching a lot of videos and learning it inside and out.

    2 years later and I’m an Endpoint Manager/Intune pro.

    • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      6 months ago

      90% of IT and software jobs are “I have common sense, know how to look up information, and my boss is intimidated by my work so they don’t question it.”

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think white space should be used to represent basic functions too. For example 3 spaces can be used to sum two values while 4 spaces can be used to subtract.

      • nicolauz@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, however indentation still defines block and the operator (white space in same cases) has to come right after the white space for the indent

  • Sunoc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    Make it purely functional, lisp based with reversed Polish notation and APL symboles, I dare you mf

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    Make sure it’s not whitespace sensitive and requires explicit typing, just to mess with everyone.

  • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Make it so the capitalization affects the scope.

    Oh wait.

    (Sorry, I recently had to switch to golang for work, and I’m just not used to it yet, and I’m getting annoyed by some of these design decisions)

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just today I heard someone whining about how in LinkedIn and other recruitment sites there’s like five bazillion profile tag options for RDMBSes and various dialects of SQL… when in actuality the recruiters are probably only concerned if the developer can do a bloody SELECT and stuff.

  • Zangoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Screw it. Let’s actually make python script an ISA that gets run on physical hardware with no higher level tooling. Then we can have the python virtual environment which runs this for fools who don’t have the right hardware. Finally, when people start complaining about naming we make Python Script 2.1, which is a JIT language built on top of IL that looks nothing like either of them but can emulate both python and python script with the performance cost of being a quarter as fast as both.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly if someone irons out the edge cases, python probably could JIT compile to machine code via cython. It would take a fair bit of memory and probably a bit slow on low powered systems but it would be so much faster if cached.

      • Zangoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Technically I think python already has an intermediate step that it uses before it starts running a script that compiles it into a lower-ish language (at least the cpython interpreter does this, it probably isn’t a part of the language specification though)

        The actual line between JIT languages and interpreted languages is pretty thin since I think most interpreted languages do something similar to minimize the amount that needs to be done at runtime

        • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I think at this point in time it JIT compiles into byte code and cached which is more efficiently interpreted the next time that function is called.