The denial comes after a Republican claimed Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas had refused to boost protective measures.
  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
    899·
    6 months ago

    I think this article that lists five different times the Secret Service had major security lapses since 2012 is also worth reading

    My theory is that Trump was getting the best security the Secret Service can give, and they’re just really bad at their jobs for some reason

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      1342·
      6 months ago

      Is it just that it’s a really fucking hard job? How do you protect someone who wants to travel the country and stand in front of live audiences of thousands of people, without getting in the way of the personal experience they are trying to sell?

      If you are as controversial as Trump, anyone can be an assassin and the secret service have to somehow separate crazy fan from crazy assassin, in a thousand different venues. The only real option is a bulletproof Popemobile.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
        545·
        6 months ago

        I mean, I definitely wouldn’t want to do their job (and Trump with his thing for rallies is probably extra tough), but I don’t think the drunk driving crashes and visiting sex workers while traveling overseas with the President helps

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          151·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, I’ll give you that one. I’m assuming there’s a super tough process to be selected for the secret service, like an astronaut selection process? But maybe I’m assuming wrong.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
            391·
            6 months ago

            @[email protected] made a really good comment here that I think starts to answer this

            I imagine it’s just incredibly difficult to take your job super seriously when any given thing only happens like once every 5-10 years, and probably not to you. I imagine most secret service people who are doing security spend 100% of their careers just standing around and then retire with nothing having happened.

            At one point, US embassy security details had this problem, and what they settled on was rotating active-duty combat troops in straight from the field so they were super alert. After about 6 months they would start to relax, and they would rotate them out and have fresh people.

            I won’t claim to know what the answer is for the SS but clearly there are some issues with the way they’re doing it.

            I could see something like - someone is the best of the best, gets selected for a very prestigious Secret Service posting, then nothing happens and they just have to pick up dry cleaning and watch the fanciest and most pretentious people in the world attend cocktail parties for several years, and eventually they end up visiting sex workers and drinking on duty and things like that

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              15·
              6 months ago

              That’s a really good point, it must be hard keeping them on top of their game.

              • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                5·
                6 months ago

                I am not in security, but I have worked in secure areas. The way you prevent issues is having multiple layers of security that watch each other.

                Like you prevent individual employees from committing fraud by having other employees sign off on their work. Then you prevent those employees from colluding to commit fraud by having another group of employees monitor their actions. Finally a third group of employees audits everyone occasionally (at random).

                This way it requires at least 4 people who don’t know each other to do anything illegal. I’m sure the Secret Service could do with some audits. Like literally have an entire team of Secret Service people test them, trying to trick them into making a mistake.

            • vividspecter@lemm.ee
              7·
              6 months ago

              Somewhat unrelated topic, but this is why driving is so dangerous at a population level. Most of the time, nothing happens even if you take a bunch of risks. But if enough risks occur at the same time, people die (Swiss cheese model).

          • Wrench@lemmy.world
            6·
            6 months ago

            I think most secret service are ex military, often special ops. Former SEALS, etc.

            You tend to get a certain kind of personality with that kind of experience. So you have to accept a little bit of risk with after hour entertainment.

          • IamSparticles@lemmy.zipEnglish
            2·
            6 months ago

            To get assigned to protect a president? Yes, that’s a pretty tough selection process. The Secret Service has other responsibilities, though. Presidential protection details are just one possible assignment. It just happens to be the most high profile and prestigious assignment. But they were actually chartered as a law-enforcement/intelligence branch of the Department of the Treasury, so they also investigate a range of financial crimes, including (but not limited to) forgery, counterfeiting, wire fraud, etc. At the time that it was decided the president needed constant protection (after McKinley was assassinated in 1901), the FBI didn’t exist yet, or else they might have gotten the job.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.worldEnglish
        378·
        6 months ago

        Someone reported the shooter 3 minutes before the first shots were fired.
        “Follow up on suspicious reports” doesn’t sound like it’s a very hard part of the job.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          697·
          6 months ago

          “There’s a shooter in the stadium somewhere, find them in the next 3 minutes” actually sounds like a really hard job.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          81·
          6 months ago

          It wasn’t clear from the Trump-visor guy that he actually reported anything, just yelled and pointed and assumed they’d pick up on it. What the security actually saw and heard is another question. Maybe if you see a suspected assassin coming for your godking, it’s important enough to actually leave your seat and talk to someone directly.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        6 months ago

        It’s a “hard job,” yet they were literally informed about the shooter crawling to location and ignored it. Seems like incompetence at minimum

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      322·
      6 months ago

      My guess is that most of his SS agents are chosen because they’re loyalists, not because of any particular skill.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      241·
      6 months ago

      I imagine it’s just incredibly difficult to take your job super seriously when any given thing only happens like once every 5-10 years, and probably not to you. I imagine most secret service people who are doing security spend 100% of their careers just standing around and then retire with nothing having happened.

      At one point, US embassy security details had this problem, and what they settled on was rotating active-duty combat troops in straight from the field so they were super alert. After about 6 months they would start to relax, and they would rotate them out and have fresh people.

      I won’t claim to know what the answer is for the SS but clearly there are some issues with the way they’re doing it.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    381·
    6 months ago

    Pissing off the Secret Service might not be the best move considering they know where all the bodies, metaphorical and possibly literal, are buried.