Summary

TikTok plans to shut down its U.S. operations by January 19 unless the Supreme Court blocks a new law requiring its sale by Chinese parent company ByteDance.

The law, defended by the Biden administration as a national security measure, has been challenged by TikTok, ByteDance, and users as a violation of free speech.

The court, facing pressure from Trump to delay a decision, will hear arguments just days before the law’s implementation.

A shutdown could cost TikTok millions of users and ad revenue, with a ruling expected soon.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    replace “data” with “ads/propaganda/right-wing content”.

    Sorry about the bad quality, i’ve resent this picture so many times now that there’s barely any pixels left.

    • FuzzyWeevil@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      Meanwhile, FB and Google which are courting Trump, and Elon courting both Trump and Nazis, are perfectly fine.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Why do people.keep saying this? It’s obviously not fine.

        These guys get dragged in front of Congress all the time. The US has the right to take measures against a business they feel they can’t control, doing things they consider detrimental to it’s people. Ideally that would occur in a more balanced method than now, and it would be nice if Nazi’s weren’t also American citizens with 1st amendment rights, but here we are.

        There are many Chinese based companies that do business on American soil with no issues. This isn’t even really Chinese based, but has a major Chinese stakeholder. For some reason, this company, over many others, was believed to be a threat. It may not be the weird racism you’re being led to believe. What if it actually is a very credible threat from an outside actor? Is there a world where that’s possible and acceptable to you?

        Just curious because I feel like there’s some strange zeoltry for TikTok that I haven’t seen so much with other media corporations lately, that aren’t actively pumping out propaganda. FOX News being the obvious example.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Stricter laws restricting data collection would actually solve the problem but that will hurt the American propaganda machine just as much. China will diffuse it’s propaganda through our own social media like they clearly already do. They can literally buy the data from our own data brokers, it won’t even stop them from being effective.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s not simply about collecting data. That’s only part of the problem.

      Why do people keep repeating this like it’s the only thing.

      Tiktok controls the algorithm controlling which clips get shown. Combined with the data, this means they can propaganda individuals so hard it will make your head spin.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        this means they can propaganda individuals so hard it will make your head spin.

        Until you have an open source algorithm then any organization controlling a social media site can push propaganda. Just like they do here in the US.

        The reason that Tiktok is being banned has nothing to do with data. We know this because you can just buy data about Americans legally from data brokers. This isn’t about Chinese propaganda either. The real reason is that Tiktok is not easily put on a leash by the federal government. The real reason is that Tiktok has a large amount of popular leftist and anti-establishment voices. The real reason is that the US wants to funnel people into the social media sites that jump when the government tells them to.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, Chinese leadership was complaining about the mass migration from Twitter to Bluesky because it rendered their bit accounts useless, so it’s not like it’s a secret or anything.

      This has always been about how TikTok can’t be bought out as a propaganda machine by American billionaires.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “It’s to protect our citizens from China!”

      “Are we going to have stronger data protection laws across all 50 states and the federal government to help protect our citizens?”

      “That sounds like a terrorist wanting privacy to hide form Facebook and Google’s data to the NSA!”

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Why is everything so glacially slow anymore. Fucking do something! I’ve been hearing about the demise of TiKTok for like three YEARS. Die already. Or don’t, I’m just sick of hearing about how it “might close” any fucking day now.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Dunno why the last bit was removed. Ruins the wordplay that would apply perfectly here.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    People really cheering this? I don’t like TikTok because I don’t much care for that style of short form video - but let’s not act like it would be better under US tech giant control. Worse, I’d say.

    Officials say Chinese authorities can compel ByteDance to hand over information on TikTok’s U.S. patrons

    Oooooh scaaaaary. I’d feel much safer having it under the control of a government who actually affects my life. 🙄

    Red scare 2.0 bullshit

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I am conditioned to be revolted by autoplay videos. Even here, when I opened this post on the mobile web version, a video autoplayed at the top and I immediately stopped it.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Idk, I think all these governments having trade and tech wars is bad for our freedom. But on the other hand, TikTok is pure misinformation slop.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          maybe people don’t need as much freedom as they think they do.

          The quiet part is a bit loud here my blue conservative friend.

        • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          That’s not how freedom is defined in the constitution though. We are not in China or North Korea but are heading in that direction.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

              1st amendment is right to free press and right to free speech. Several amendments imply a right to privacy from the government, such as the 3rd 4th and 9th.

              The government should not regulate how I make my speech. That’s ridiculous to give them the right to remove how people are allowed to speak.

              Good to know people are willing to give themselves more chains to a fascist Trump government if they don’t like the UI of an app.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

                [Laughs in War in Drugs.]

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                16 hours ago

                There are already government regulations on what you can do on your ‘private’ device and what you can do on your private time.

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Cool, so why stop there! Just make it so they always have access to my phone! Why would I need the right to use anything I want?

                  The government now needs needs me to get court approval to speak my mind to Trump. Require paperwork just to develop an app.

                  Surely nothing bad will happen if we just let this pot of water rise with frogs advocating it to get hotter.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                15 hours ago

                What is it, the sixty-ninth amendment?

                ‘An unregulated internet, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear apps, shall not be infringed’?

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  This just in, nothing ever changes. Black people are still 3/5th of a person, women don’t have the right to vote, the vice president is 2nd place winner, and people don’t elect senators.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      The best possible outcome would have been a digital bill of rights that applies to all social media. Please step outside the Amazon box youre thinking out of.