• Mozilla has issued a warning about Microsoft’s design practices, claiming that the company uses harmful design tactics to influence users to switch to its Edge browser.
  • The report highlights how Microsoft interrupts the installation process of Google Chrome on Windows devices, promoting the security and privacy benefits of Edge.
  • Mozilla calls for regulatory action to restore browser choice and competition across major platforms.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/koBY6


Chrome

Windows

Well there’s your problem!

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      I like that part of firefox’s summary was that it’s free. Uh, yeah, they all are. Thanks Mozilla!

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t remember that. Where is it from?

      Microsoft never liked competing browsers (not even in the pre-IE6 era when all they had was crap), so it’s hard to believe it came from them.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        EU fined the sh1t out of them, and somebody in the regulatory body at the time realized that was not enough. So they were ordered to present the user with a choice of a browser during the OS install.

        What I really want to know is why and how it went away.

          • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, but apparently people are going to be a cunt about it if one chooses not to say it.

            • Specal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Because it’s looks stupid to use the word whilst censoring it, say it or don’t say it. No point in trying to pretend you’re not saying it.

          • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’d say I got a good habit. Too much of the internet randomly filters “obscenity”. Whenever that happens it seems the devs are too fvkin damb to properly implement it.

            • Melt@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah god damn the censor shit, even on fucking picture, they censor the swear words to fucking hell by scribing over it

            • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Its verry much a good habit. However, You are free to speak your mind here. The fact you use sh1t (falsely) implies the idea that your the community is not allowed to speak your their mind. So people got mad 🫤.

              EDIT: grammar / clarity

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 months ago

          What I really want to know is why and how it went away.

          The move was in place because of the fear that IE was becoming a monopoly. Now Edge is very very far from the most popular browser, and Google Chrome is looking like the overwhelmingly dominant player, there’s no reason to make MS prompt people to download rival products anymore.

        • neclimdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          INAL but my understanding was a lot of the fines and penalties hung on IE being part of the OS. I think it was the update functionality but don’t quote me.

          So with some legal technicalities, later versions of windows made it “not” part of the OS just a bundled application. A legal distinction without meaning but it meant they didn’t need to do these things anymore.

          • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            The great joke is they are making the same mistakes again with edge, unfortunately the American justice system is a shambles these days so it’s probably down to the EU to take the moral high ground.

            Microsoft appear to be exposed to monopolistic penalties in several markets currently: browsers, AI / search, teams and office come to mind (although competitors are lacking, here)

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think it will be back this March with the new laws (Digital Markets Act).

      • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        Opera gave up a long time ago when they abandoned Presto. Today it is owned by some Chinese company, and they are just chasing the latest buzzwords, crypto, AI, you name it.

  • Geo_bot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    9 months ago

    Microsoft really trying to get away with what it did in the browser wars again, but it’s probably gonna turn out on for them this time

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    The clickbait in this article is so bad, I thought it was a security vulnerability or something, but it’s just something else related to Mozilla again.

    I’m still genuinely curious if Mozilla is going to actually accept a renewal for the search deal with Google, or if they’re actually going to start practicing with a praise and try implementing that search engine selection screen.

    • Alcatorda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      9 months ago

      practicing with a praise

      Not sure what you mean but maybe you were going for “practicing what they preach”?

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      or if they’re actually going to start practicing with a praise and try implementing that search engine selection screen.

      You already can change the default search engine?

      • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can, but that’s not the point. The idea is to ask users to choose upon opening the app for the first time. It’s an already common statistic that most people never actually change any settings beyond basic personalization. It’s part of why Google spends so much money on setting Google Search as the default engine.

        • odelik@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I recently set up Firefox on my Windows PC and it asked me on the FTUE wizard what search engine I wanted to use as my default.

          ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s a weak argument. If Microsoft bundled Edge with Windows and stopped at that, nobody would be complaining about it. The problem is how annoying it is at nagging users to try Edge.

          Same with Firefox. If a user changed the search engine, only for Firefox to “forget” that choice one hour later, or if it had popups saying “Hey you have DDG as your search engine. Do you want try Google instead?” [ Yes ] [ Ask me again in an hour ]," then I for sure would have a fucking problem with that.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago

    So Microsoft just does the same shit they’ve done a hundred times before and have been penalized for a hundred times before.

    Give them a few billion dollars fine.

    Jail those managers that made this decision

    THAT will make sure they will start behaving. If not, it’s all just “please don’t” and Microsoft being “suuuuurely we would never ever!”

    Fuck Microsoft

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      have been penalized for a hundred times before

      That’s where you’re wrong. The last time they shoveled their browser at us in clearly anti-competitive ways they were found guilty and then … nothing. Essential software or some such, and nothing.

      So no, they haven’t been penalized; not on their Sherman offence, and here they go repeating it.

      Hammer them.

  • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Whenever I’m forced to use Edge for work it reminds me of old IE that your grandma installed the Ask toolbar in. Functions about the same too.

    • Inky@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is there any material difference between Edge and Chrome? I’m forced to use either of them for work and as far as I can tell they perform the same

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        With Edge, MS decided to re-implement some stuff through their own library. I don’t have an exhaustive list, but one particular thing is that for a while, SubtleCrypto (used for various operations within JavaScript) was present, but some mandatory algorithms were not available in Edge while they worked fine everywhere else (and maybe even in the non-chromium based Edge, which I don’t remember testing).

        So, yes, there are differences beyond the integration of MS services. They are unlikely to matter to most people, but for dev it does reintroduce some weird quirks, as MS does.

      • Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There are small annoying differences. The way it handles downloads is irritating. The settings menus are not well organized. There’s a big stupid Bing button unless you remove it. It randomly fails to honor the option to open PDFs in an external program. It’s nothing big, but if you’re forced to use it for work, it’s constantly annoying.

      • Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Functionally they are the same. People that claim one is slower are just parroting what they’ve heard or experienced before

  • Piwix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Legit malware shown in this article. Imagine an operating system/browser injecting what are essentially ads into your webpage. Whether or not chrome or edge are any good these are scummy tactics by microsoft

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah MS has never done anything like that before…

    Looks at MS Word in early nineties…

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      That would be a sure fire way to get Microsoft to pull completely out of Europe leaving thousands of companies without support and a heafty unpaid fine setting on the table.

      It would actually be beneficial for Microsoft to abandon the server farms and offices leaving workers with an email stating the situation and their new job status.

      • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You think Microsoft has no assets in Europe? Asset seizure is a sure fire way to get paid when companies refuse to cooperate.

        • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If it’s a choice between abandoning assets or going bankrupt I think they’d choose abandoning assets. The only exception to that rule is if they have the majority of their company there and that’s just not the case being an American company.

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You think they make no profits in Europe? Why would they be here if they didn’t?

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would love the mayhem that would ensue from Microsoft leaving Europe completely. Dumb fuckers in all those incompetent IT departments that have wasted countless hours of mine because they don’t understand jack shit of what they’re doing would be having strokes, and us geeks would be having a field day keeping essential stuff alive, like medical technology and power plants.

      • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        How could they pull out of Europe if they straight up didn’t exist? I’m suggesting the European Union should fine them enough to go bankrupt.

        • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They wouldn’t pay the fine that would bankrupt them they’d just cut there losses and abandon anything that was seised. They’re an American company and the Asian market is what there after nowadays anyway.

          If you could cut a dead limb off to save the body, wouldn’t you? At the end of the day it depends on how the US and Europe handles civil cases across borders and Microsoft has a lot of ties with the US government.

            • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not all bad just the federal for the most part. We’re working on that but are politicians are as old as the hills. I believe they spend more time listening to corporate lobby pitches than reading the damn news but that’s our problem to deal with.

              Most of the biggest tech giants have picked up jobs from homeland or the NSA at one point in time or another, Microsoft is just the most prevalent along with Facebook (meta).

              • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m stuck with one of the most fucked state governments, too. Actually, it’s so bad I’ve been aiming to leave for a while, and I’ll likely be gone within the next six weeks ish.

      • Pyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Far easier to do too. I did one of each last month and there’s no question that the Windows setup experience is terrible in comparison.

          • XenoDial@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            And that’s the part that everyone ignores. They’ll say open a VM or use wine or there’s an open source alternative. But if I’m going to run native Linux just to open a windows VM to run the primary software I use, what’s the point? I’m not bashing on either side. I use Windows when I need and, and go back to Linux when I’m finished, but that’s because that’s the solution that works for me.

          • Pyro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Same here, to a certain extent.

            I was referring only to Linux’s lack of bullshittery in comparison to Windows, nothing else.

          • nintendiator@feddit.cl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            File the required issues with those manufacturers then. Support for Linux is trivially easy to add compared to Microsoft: the kernel sources and stuff to create your modules are right there.

            • BURN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              That works until they explicitly say they won’t support Linux, eg. Adobe, Bungie, GoXLR, etc

              Plenty of companies know that it’s trivial to implement. They just simply do not care, nor will they ever care.

          • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Linux community arrogance is to deny the device driver issues and think Apple is fine, when the reason Apple thrives is because they don’t have open hardware like Linux, BSD, Windows…

            Hardware companies are rarely held account for their absent support of Linux - some campaigns have come and gone, but in the end Linux users tend to arrogantly say it’s trivial to switch and embrace dishonesty. I guess they figure Microsoft is dishonest, so they normalize it.

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            100% same

            I was needing to boot back to windows multiple times per day to accomplish simple tasks, and that made Linux no longer worth the hassle.

      • kylian0087@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It will never support 100% of games. Mainly due to extremly agresive anti cheats that are the same as root kits.

      • nintendiator@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        You mean, when your games get around to supporting Linux, right? File the required issues with those manufacturers.

      • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Alright, continue to suffer on Windows. Or fix it yourself.

        Edit: I should have taken a different approach. It is difficult for older games or games specifically made for the Windows System. However there are many efforts made by good people. Valve’s Proton is doing good things and Lutris is also making it easier. I am not expecting that all the games will run however there a few options that others made such as filing issues with the manufacturers or supporting projects that try to port it / fix it in some other way.

          • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Again, I am an idiot. So taken down the bad comment. Don’t assume and react based on those assumptions, me.

            I am hungry and probably should go out for a snack.

            • Kayn@dormi.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Quoting the conversation you replied to:

              Again, install Linux already and be done with this shit.

              When Linux gets around to supporting all the games I like I will

              Yes, the wording of “when Linux gets around to supporting” was bad and can be interpreted as “Linux needs to do the work”. We who are familiar with Linux know that game support depends on the game’s developer, not on any certain OS or plarform. You need to keep in mind that not everyone is as proficient with operating systems as we are, and thus not everybody might be aware who is at fault for lack of support.

              You belittled the person in your comment, first assuming that they “suffer” on Windows, and then telling them to fix it themselves. You can’t have meant that genuinely; after recognizing that they misunderstood the support situation, it should have been obvious to you that they’re not capable of fixing the support themselves. So it must have been a snarky remark of yours and little more.

              Instead of being this condescending, your comment should have been educational, explaining whose fault the lack of support actually is. Not even necessarily for the person you replied to, but for the sake of everyone else who finds this thread at a later point in time.

              Even if you don’t need Linux to win, I ask you that you consider how your comments reflect on the Linux community at large. What will people think when they see how you reply to people voicing their concerns?

              Would you be happy being part of a community that although representing a genuine effort towards freedom from big tech, is perceived as elitist and insular by outsiders? I use Linux too, and I wouldn’t be.

              • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                You make a valid point, I shall address my comments made. My assumptions made are a bit crass and short-sighted.

          • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Why bother trying to convince people like you who only complain about Windows, but are way too lazy to do anything about? It’s just a waste of my time. I’d much rather gloat about how I don’t have to deal with crap like this. Don’t come on here and expect sympathy for something that is entirely within your power to change.

            • Kayn@dormi.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’d much rather gloat about how I don’t have to deal with crap like this.

              Alright, go ahead and do that. Surely that’ll help the mainstream perception of Linux and its community.

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    What is this clickbait bullshit? Here I was expecting more arguments I could use to move people away from Chrome, but the warning is just typical Microsoft trying to promote their own garbage browser.

  • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a super clickbait title.

    Yes, what Microsoft does is pretty shitty but the article sounds like there’s some massive zero day hack or something to watch out for when it’s just standard business practice.

    • AnActOfCreation@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agreed. I would’ve changed it except I had in the back of my mind that the post title needed to match the article title, but now I don’t see that in the rules. Oh well. But yeah the article is not really about Chrome at all.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        You know what else is different about Lemmy? Post titles are editable!

  • Teknikal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think this will ultimately backfire on them I gave the bing app a chance on my phone and I got so tired of the try edge interruptions I unninstalled everything Microsoft.

    The search was actually decent but the constant nagging was very annoying.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I updated my proton app recently and as I was updating it Microsoft edge updater tried installing updates as well for some reason.

    I don’t even have edge installed. I simply blocked it from having net access but still, they can go take a flying fuck at a rolling donut if they think I’m putting that on my system.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      One time I uninstalled Edge and Cortana from Win10. Some time later Windows Updates started to fail and would rollback. This continued for 6 months and by that time I stopped giving a shit since Win10 is malware anyway.

      Another few months went by and I was bored enough to follow the usually useless links to MS knowledge base articles that are given after a failed update.

      After another week of trying everything I came across or could think of, I downloaded the install for Edge and reinstalled. Ran the Windows Update again and the god damned thing was successful. Apparently it contained an Edge-specific update but didn’t check if it was installed or not and fail gracefully if it was the latter.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      they can go take a flying fuck at a rolling donut if they think I’m putting that on my system.

      The only way to be serious about that is to not use Windows.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’d like to flip to Linux, but I have an older nvidia card that doesn’t play well with it, so until I upgrade some hardware win 10 will have to do. At least I’m firewalled so I can block their shit when it tries shenanigans like that.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          How old are we talking? Most distros have legacy driver packages that go back a fair bit.

          • Jay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Nearly 10 now. Finding drivers wasn’t an issue, but just couldn’t get much performance out of them.

            I’m probably going to update some stuff this summer and possibly flip to Amd so I’ll probably try again then.