Manjaro Linux is Arch Linux based. Manjaro and Arch relation is like Ubuntu and Debian relation.
Manjaro has its own set of issues that you may want to stay away from.
Edit: Ignore this comment, the image was loaded late. I thought it was a genuine question.
Thanks for linking this, I had totally missed the problems with manjaro.
Meh. I’ve been using Manjaro for two years now. So far so good. System has been working perfectly.
Do we really need to bring that bullshit over from Reddit? Manjaro is fine, Arch is fine, distroshaming is for children.
beeb boop
i was hopeful for manjaro. bad management for sure
for me, Debian -> Ubuntu -> Arch -> Artix -> Void -> Gentoo. I’ll reach my final form when I finally run LFS.
One of if not the worst Linux distros opinio i’ve ever seen.
I use Mint, Arch (technically Asahi), Debian, Ubuntu, and I used to use Manjaro.
They all have their places. Mint has the best UI/stable no-fuss desktop experience, for instance.
Arch does not have a place though. It’s just a more buggy Arch with a worse maintaining team
EDIT: Actually, tbh it’s incorrect to even call Manjaro Arch. That’s an insult to Arch
Arch … [is] just a more buggy Arch
I know you meant to say Manjaro, but that’s a pretty funny take.
Oops lol
Leaving in
