• dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    On second thought, maybe I do want an “us vs. them” with “them” being people who use downvotes as an “I disagree” button.

    Disclaimer: this was meant as a joke.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      I did not realize there were downvote rules. How am I supposed to use my downvote?

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There aren’t, but it’s worth thinking about what a vote does. In Lemmy and similar systems, comments with higher scores are listed first and seen by more people. A downvote means “fewer people should see this”.

        Now perhaps you just believe fewer people should see things you disagree with. That’s not my position, but I won’t try to talk you out of it here. If that’s not your position, however and you instead believe civil, well-reasoned discussion between people who have different viewpoints is valuable, then using votes to simply express agreement or disagreement will not serve to promote such discussion.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          How about a second vote system for agree/disagree, because I agree with you in principle and try to use it this way, but in practice the votes are definitely used for that. Now that I write it out though I realize people will just double smash both buttons when they disagree anyway.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wonder whether up/down, like/dislike, etc… is the right concept for discussions. Slashdot’s concept of attaching a label like “insightful” or “off-topic” when rating a comment seems like a good idea to me; the UI nudges people toward the admin’s preferred reasons for voting.

      • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Definitely not a strict rule and I wouldn’t want to force anyone to do it the way I do (maybe I should have marked my comment as a joke) but as far as I understand, downvotes were originally meant for spam or low-quality/low-effort comments. Stuff that just doesn’t add anything to the duscussion and isn’t worth reading. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often on Lemmy.

        Downvoting comments that you disagree with just to bury them, especially without even leaving a comment that explains why you disagree, just feels petty.

        Overall, I’d rather upvote a well-written comment even if I disagree with its contents and downvote ten “yeah, same” comments that agree with me but add nothing to the discussion.

      • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s more like “etiquette.” The downvote button serves to bury a comment or post, so it’s arguably best to use it as a “this isn’t relevant or is hateful/unproductive” button.