• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      He would get blocked there because BlueSky will comply with legal requests as well, because if they don’t they will face criminal charges and/or massive fines. BlueSky, being a platform that loves censorship, would not challenge the legal order in court like X are either.

      Even fediverse instance owners would be forced to block his accounts under threat of fines and/or prosecution.

      edit: BlueSky have already blocked his account lol

      https://bsky.app/profile/ssg.dev/post/3lmuz3nr62k26

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        if they don’t they will face criminal charges

        The Turkish government does not have the authority to enforce criminal charges on an American person/company.

        Even fediverse instance owners would be forced to block his accounts under threat of fines and/or prosecution.

        Only if the instance owners/servers were in Turkey.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Criminal charges was probably the wrong word, but that’s being pedantic. The company operates in Turkey and allows Turkish people to use the product, so they have to follow Turkish laws. The Turkish government can file legal charges against them for failure to comply. Same with any fediverse instance owners - they would either have to block their instance from all Turkish users, or comply.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            that’s being pedantic

            It’s not. At all.

            they would either have to block their instance from all Turkish users, or comply.

            No, they wouldn’t. Once again, Turkey has no authority over people and servers not located in their jurisdiction.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              The Turkish government has legal authority over companies that are serving their citizens.

              Why do you think the GDPR laws were such a big deal even outside of the UK?

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                The Turkish government has legal authority over companies that are serving their citizens.

                No. They don’t. You can keep repeating this non-sense but it’s simply untrue.

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  You don’t think companies that operate in Turkey for Turkish citizens have to follow any Turkish laws?

                  Again - GDPR.

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    You don’t think companies that operate in Turkey

                    Lemmy is not a company and the users and servers located outside of Turkey are not subject to the jurisdiction of Turkey.

                    If you’re just going to repeat the same non-sense over and over without any evidence I’m going to block you.