The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics.

The 25-year-old also remains barred from swimming in the female category after failing to overturn rules introduced by swimming’s governing body in the summer of 2022, which prohibit anyone who has undergone “any part of male puberty” from the female category.

Thomas had argued that those rules should be declared “invalid and unlawful” as they were contrary to the Olympic charter and the World Aquatics constitution.

However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming.

The news was welcomed by World Aquatics, who hailed it as “a major step forward in our efforts to protect women’s sport”.

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Back to the discussion. It would basically be this if we took the 10% of each and put it into 4 categories.

    Group A 85%men 15% women

    Group B 70%men 30% women

    Group C 55%men 45%women

    Group D 5%men 95%women

    It just doesn’t work. You would be hand picking less qualified men to compete with the women just to fill it up.

    • Kabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      On what basis doesn’t it work, though? I’m still not sure I understand what the problem is with your example.

      You would be hand picking less qualified men to compete with the women just to fill it up.

      Another way of looking at it is that we would in fact be widening the criteria of who would be considered “qualified”.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        In only one group would the women win a significant portion of the events? You basically created an Olympics with a bottom 25% female category, and 3 male categories. The women can already compete with the men if they want to, but they want medals too, not just to be there…. The best women would be overshadowed by the best men, you would only be showing off the worst of the top female athletes.

        Expanding? When you need a d list male to compete with a b list female? Come on.