The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics.

The 25-year-old also remains barred from swimming in the female category after failing to overturn rules introduced by swimming’s governing body in the summer of 2022, which prohibit anyone who has undergone “any part of male puberty” from the female category.

Thomas had argued that those rules should be declared “invalid and unlawful” as they were contrary to the Olympic charter and the World Aquatics constitution.

However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming.

The news was welcomed by World Aquatics, who hailed it as “a major step forward in our efforts to protect women’s sport”.

  • krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’re directly contradicting the argument that every trans activist has been making for decades by saying that sex and gender are “effectively the same thing”. Is that really what you want to be doing here?

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s objectively the truth that sex is another class category created by humans to sort people and enforce a hierarchy of sex. That argument (trans women are male women) was adopted to appeal to cisgender people.

      I’m female, I am a woman. I’m not male. My legal sex is female.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s objectively the truth that sex is another class category created by humans to sort people and enforce a hierarchy of sex.

        This is patently false. It was a category to distinguish between two observable variations of human. The category of man/woman existed in the annals of history far beyond what we know today. Before we were humans, we knew instinctively what a man/woman was. You see these systems in herding species already. Don’t give me this “we created this division just so we could dunk on others” bullcrap.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But there are more than 2 observable variations of humans.

          There have also been many cultures with more 2 than sexes/genders (the difference is literally 0 prior to the 50s).

          And animals have genitals but they do not have conceptions of sex. They don’t abstract categories from physical attributes they just recognize and respond to the bodies around them.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        So what do you call a baby that has a penis but isn’t old enough to tell you whether they are a boy or a girl?