- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Elon Musk’s FSD v12 demo includes a near miss at a red light and doxxing Mark Zuckerberg — 45-minute video was meant to demonstrate v12 of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving but ended up being a list of thi…::Elon Musk posted a 45-minute live demonstration of v12 of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving feature. During the video, Musk has to take control of the vehicle after it nearly runs a red light. He also doxxes Mark Zuckerberg.
deleted by creator
If we apply that same theory to @ElonJet, then that wouldn’t be doxxing either. Obviously Elon thinks otherwise. If @ElonJet is doxxing, then so is this.
deleted by creator
Is that why he has been trying to ban ElonJet?
deleted by creator
Excuse me, this is the internet. You have to form a view on someone and then either agree or disagree with everything they do consistently otherwise it’s illegal.
deleted by creator
Intent.
Isn’t that a little bit of circular reasoning?
If I doxx someone online then it gets indexed by Google, if someone then Google’s the information it stops being doxxing?
I’d assume most doxxing isn’t done by someone who has unique firsthand knowledge (e.g. “Oh I know John, he lives on so and so road”) and instead is done by finding the information online whether via Google or a different public source.
At least in the US, where a ridiculous amount of private information is deemed “public”.
releasing the information versus acquiring the released information are two different thing.
Most doxxers don’t technically release the information, rather they’ve acquired it and point others to where they’ve acquired it or simply disseminate it further.
AKA release it.
deleted by creator
That’s what I’m saying. In most cases the doxxer isn’t the one who originally provided the info, but rather someone who has found the information online via a Google search or something similar.
deleted by creator