YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

  • essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sure I’ll be downvoted to hell, but I just pay for Premium because I use YouTube all the time, don’t want to see ads, and acknowledge that YouTube is an incredible service/product.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think that’s an unfair thing to say at all.

      I want to pay for Premium, but a mixture of oppressive tactics, poor payouts for YouTubers, and constant price hikes has made me reconsider. I watch YouTube more than most streaming providers, and that list continues to shrink because the cost has outpaced the value. A few years ago I couldn’t imagine not watching Netflix, but now…eh, cancel it.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The fact that google also tracks and monetizes/exploits every single thing you do should be more than enough payment. Considering thats how they got to be where they are in the first place.

        Besides. If google moderated its fucking ads to begin with, people wouldnt have overwhelmingly adopted adblocking, since google adsense is like the biggest adserver on the internet.

    • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      If YouTube were an independent company, I would be much happier to pay like I do for Spotify and even (borderline) Paramount Plus. I have no problem paying artists for their time, and I have spent thousands and thousands on commissions and merchandise from independent people and art businesses. Google already has enough money. I would rather save my money for small(er) companies who actually need it.

      If people stopped supporting these ultra-consolidated megacorporations, we might have a healthier economy and better worker’s rights overall. But what do I know lol

    • Ghostface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey very valid statement and salute to you.

      Personally, I believe this ultimately hurts and affects customers like yourself. Because YT is spending all of this additional effort to effect and crowdout, if looked at a very tiny percentage. Instead of investing into platform improvements for visitors and creators.

      YT should of focused on competition which is every other streaming service. If they provided shows still using network ads breaks, instead of these psycho every 4min you 2.5mins of ads unless you pay is just extortion. Plus they aren’t really sharing revenue with creators… sigh

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m in the same boat. There are a lot of parts of the Internet that should be free, but YouTube is not one of them. Video hosting is one of the most resource intensive services around, and if we as consumers aren’t paying for it they’ll find a worse way to fund it.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s just gonna make premium more expensive because they have to recoup their engineering costs somehow and I don’t think that the extra ad views from bypassing as blockers will cover it.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same. My adblockers are still in place, but YouTube premium is by far the best bang for the buck I spend on entertainment. My family uses it every day on multiple devices, and then we get YT music too.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Me too, I’ve had YouTube premium since it was called YouTube Red and I was still in middle school lol.

    • Intrama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a decent price. I use both the original app and the music one. No regrets at all!

      • cheddar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not so decent if you only need YouTube though. The package is good, but not everyone needs the full package.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Based on what I’ve heard from creators, they love us premium subscribers. If I get no ads and the people I like get more money, I call that a win. Having just been to the movies which have about an hour of unskippable ads at the beginning - including ads to show more ads - I’m willing to pay to not have that in my life.

    • slumberlust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I also pay, and share to several family members to help justify the cost.

      That just makes us shills though; consumerism is a zero sum game. /s

        • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          fuck that. you want to be a musician, you play venues and engage with your fans instead of just releasing a one hit wonder that took half a week in the studio to make and made you millions