Thanks for the information though.

  • far_university190@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    𝕯𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖊 𝕶𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖘𝖊𝖐𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝖎𝖘𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖓 𝕰𝖎𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕭𝖚𝖓𝖉𝖊𝖘𝖗𝖊𝖕𝖚𝖇𝖑𝖎𝖐 𝕯𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖑𝖆𝖓𝖉

    • grandel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      No it’s not. Its just hard if they need to work in Outlook, which uses a Word Processor instead of an HTML rendering engine like any other sane email client.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This one goes right to the feels. I’ve got pretty good experience with using SSR components to generate static html with components. I’m currently using dotnet and blazor where I can make email components like a button and an image as easy as that might sound.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Its about a device with touch interface as laggy as those old ass android phones with funky fonts.

    I hate every second of interaction with this smart pot.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      yeah it uses this really neat semantic rendering programming language for serving structured documents across servers

      It’s a bit tricky, but anyone with at least a Masters in CompSci should be able to parse some of it enough to get the gist. Bear in mind that the “source” is abbreviated to src, and “image” similarly. The rest is coding that gives the computer instructions, you’ll also need to replace FILENAME in the code with the actual filename. It goes like this

       
      

      Let me know if I can explain it more clearly.

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I feel like the level of snark in your reply is… High. It doesn’t make for a pleasant interaction, and it doesn’t help make lemmy a nice place to be.

        So, if the image you want to put into your email is not hosted somewhere, what’s the best way to go about this, ensuring compatibility?

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think it’s really directed at you and moreso about making fun of the company who didn’t put in any effort to make it show up correctly.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m just being a silly billy it’s not directed at you.

          It’s more like “ah if only there was a simple solution that could’ve been used.”

          All images are hosted somewhere, I would consider an intern fresh out of college know how to correctly add an image to an email, or at least only be told once if somehow they had never seen this before.

        • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can have inline images that are only shown as part of the rendered HTML. Don’t ask me how, but you’ll find some examples in your inbox.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Let me know if I can explain it more clearly.

        Multi-part MIME containing inline images is actually what you’re looking for and it’s fairly easy to implement.

        Here’s an example. They handwave over the html section that actually refers to the inline images that they embed, but that’s the basic layout you need.

        https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/exchange_server_protocols/ms-oxcmail/7a08211a-760a-41af-8cab-0acf462c4094