A 6-month-old boy died after being left for hours in a hot car in Louisiana, authorities said.

A 6-month-old boy died after being left for hours in a hot car in Louisiana, authorities said.

The baby was found dead in the backseat by his parent at about 5:46 p.m. Tuesday, according to the East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office.

When the parent went to pick up the baby from day care after work, they realized they forgot to drop him off at day care that morning, the sheriff’s office said.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    541·
    3 months ago

    Looks like a bunch of people (I’m guessing non-parents) disagree.

    The whole idea of forgetting a baby is in the car is insane. Like I said, even if it is true, this person is not fit to take care of a baby and that baby had a good chance of dying some other way.

    • snooggums@midwest.socialEnglish
      38·
      3 months ago

      Looks like a bunch of people (I’m guessing non-parents) disagree.

      I am a parent and disagree. Surprised myself at least twice by arriving at work and seeing her still in the seat while grabbing the sun shade. Could have sworn that she had been dropped off both times.

      People aren’t perfect, and something being important doesn’t mean people suddenly become perfect. The fact that it is as rare as it is now is a sign that people take it seriously, but people make mistakes no matter how important the thing is.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      311·
      3 months ago

      Not insane at all. Child seats should be rear facing for quite a while and if the kid is asleep, they are not making any sounds. A big deviation from your routine can seriously fuck up remembering basic things. I personally have a mirror strapped to the rear headrest to avoid anything like that since I can see her every time I check my rear view mirror. But I’ve had people warn me how dangerous those are because it is an extra thing to break off in an accident. I’d rather take that risk than accidentally leave my child in a hot car.

    • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
      251·
      3 months ago

      From the Pulitzer article (please read it):

      Diamond is a professor of molecular physiology at the University of South Florida and a consultant to the veterans hospital in Tampa.[…]

      “Memory is a machine,” he says, “and it is not flawless. Our conscious mind prioritizes things by importance, but on a cellular level, our memory does not. If you’re capable of forgetting your cellphone, you are potentially capable of forgetting your child.”

      “The quality of prior parental care seems to be irrelevant,” he said. “The important factors that keep showing up involve a combination of stress, emotion, lack of sleep and change in routine, where the basal ganglia is trying to do what it’s supposed to do, and the conscious mind is too weakened to resist. What happens is that the memory circuits in a vulnerable hippocampus literally get overwritten, like with a computer program. Unless the memory circuit is rebooted – such as if the child cries, or, you know, if the wife mentions the child in the back – it can entirely disappear.”

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        820·
        3 months ago

        You posted the article after I posed the above comment. I have read it.

        Edit: to the downvoters: should I have not read it? Because I get you downvoting the previous comments but I’m not sure what your problem is with this one.

        • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
          191·
          3 months ago

          Hickling is a clinical psychologist from Albany, N.Y., who has studied the effects of fatal auto accidents on the drivers who survive them. He says these people are often judged with disproportionate harshness by the public, even when it was clearly an accident, and even when it was indisputably not their fault.

          Humans, Hickling said, have a fundamental need to create and maintain a narrative for their lives in which the universe is not implacable and heartless, that terrible things do not happen at random, and that catastrophe can be avoided if you are vigilant and responsible.

          In hyperthermia cases, he believes, the parents are demonized for much the same reasons. “We are vulnerable, but we don’t want to be reminded of that. We want to believe that the world is understandable and controllable and unthreatening, that if we follow the rules, we’ll be okay. So, when this kind of thing happens to other people, we need to put them in a different category from us. We don’t want to resemble them, and the fact that we might is too terrifying to deal with. So, they have to be monsters.”

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            912·
            3 months ago

            Yes, again, I read it. You showed I was wrong. I’m not sure what you or anyone else wants from me.

            • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              131·
              3 months ago

              Just came along. Presumably most people read your 1st comment (which is horrifyingly unempathethic, TBH) and didn’t really follow the rest of the discussion

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                35·
                3 months ago

                Maybe, but people even seem to be unhappy with me admitting I’m wrong in multiple replies. Like the one you responded to.

                Like I said, I don’t know what they want from me. I can’t unwrite the post. I don’t have a time machine.

                • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  9·
                  3 months ago

                  It’s actually pretty vague, since only one of your comments seem to actually acknowledge you having read the article, and none of your comments indicate it changed your opinion (one about you having the capability to be wrong, but I can’t tell whether you’re saying you were wrong in this case, or just a general rhetorical device).

                  I’m not judging you here, I’m pointing out there might be a huge disconnect between what you think you’ve said and what’s actually coming across that would explain the reception you’re getting.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    24·
                    3 months ago

                    I’m not sure how I’m coming across as anything but just sincerely admitting I’m wrong here:

                    I didn’t put that edit up until multiple downvotes already were given there.

                    People don’t like it when I’m wrong and they also don’t like it when I say I’m wrong.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              52·
              3 months ago

              It’s Ok. I think it’s easy to dismiss obvious situations such as these, but as a tired parent I can tell you the mind will play tricks on you. I always triple check everything because I know I’m already exhausted. I can’t fault another parent for a mistake though.

            • SeaJ@lemm.ee
              3·
              3 months ago

              We want you to go back on time and stop your former self from making the initial comment obviously. /s 🙂

            • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
              21·
              3 months ago

              Perhaps you could edit your first comment, otherwise people won’t know that you see things differently now.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                1·
                3 months ago

                I think that would be dishonest of me. I’d rather people see that I said something incorrect, especially when it’s something people commonly get wrong according to the provided article.

                • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
                  41·
                  3 months ago

                  You can certainly keep the original comment, just with an addendum. Of course you don’t have to, but it could prevent further misunderstanding