• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one [a war criminal], which I think he is.

    Yeah, he’s really trying to defend them. Sure…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      3 months ago

      He’s telling Jill what she said about Netanyahu, but he doesn’t seem to agree. He keeps doubling back and insisting she needs to condemn Putin (which she then does) and using that as a shield for Netanyahu in follow-up.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Jill Stein: Yeah. Well, let me say this. We are sponsoring that war. We are sponsoring Netanyahu. He is our dog in this fight. That is why we have a responsibility to pull him back.

        Mehdi Hasan: No disagreement from me at all.

        Jesus, why are you lying about this when everyone can read the interview?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s what I’m seeing.

              If we apply equal standards to both of them, then Hasan didn’t call Netanyahu a war criminal and Stein didn’t call Putin a war criminal. They both do this weird word dance around the topic.

              They’re both really frustrating here.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              3 months ago

              She agreed that he was a criminal when asked.

              Hasan then pivoted to complaining about Jill calling Biden and Netanyahu criminals, while asserting our sponsorship of Israel isn’t relevant to the question of war criminality.

              • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                He literally said he didn’t disagree that Netanyahu is a war criminal. This is your own logic you are arguing with. Absolutely amazing

                  • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one, which I think he is.

                    Jill Stein: Yeah. Well, let me say this. We are sponsoring that war. We are sponsoring Netanyahu. He is our dog in this fight. That is why we have a responsibility to pull him back.

                    Mehdi Hasan: No disagreement from me at all. It still doesn’t answer my question. Whether we sponsor them or not is irrelevant.

                    Do yourself a favor

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one, which I think he is.

        That’s all you need to read. If you are unable to read that one simple sentence, you are too stupid to even have a real conversation here. If you refuse to read that one simple sentence, then you are intentionally trying not to have a real conversation here.