Trump will make history as the 45th and now 47th president, NBC News projects, saying he will fix an ailing country and despite warnings he will rule as an authoritarian.
oh yea, it’ll be all “we need to come together” and “we’re going to help everybody” for the next 2 months
then, the instant he steps into office, freedom of speech: gone. freedom of the press: gone. EPA: gone. dept. of education: gone. SEC: gone. consumer protections, civil rights, equality, accountability, justice-- all. fucking. gone.
expect mass imprisonments, assassinations, and other removals
“that can’t happen in this country!!” you might be saying. why not? because of “checks and balances”? LOL
and we’re leaving out implications at the local level. why would a trumper sheriff bother going after someone for murdering marginalized peoples? why would any lawyer take up any case against a trump appointed judge (spoiler alert: it’ll be all of them, soon)?
Or could it be that your leadership and policies are seen as poor, uninspiring, and indistinguishable from the opposition amongst those that you refer to as “children or dogs?”
Also, remember that this follows HOT on the heels of SCOTUS saying “basically anything a President does is legal”. This theoretically means Trump and his admin could sidestep Congress entirely, on anything. Trump was already ruling by EO last term, but I suspect we haven’t seen anything yet.
There’s actually so much at stake that I lost track of it all. Absolutely mind blowing that a single American could vote for him let alone the majority. I do not understand why Americans hate America.
oh yea, it’ll be all “we need to come together” and “we’re going to help everybody” for the next 2 months
then, the instant he steps into office, freedom of speech: gone. freedom of the press: gone. EPA: gone. dept. of education: gone. SEC: gone. consumer protections, civil rights, equality, accountability, justice-- all. fucking. gone.
expect mass imprisonments, assassinations, and other removals
“that can’t happen in this country!!” you might be saying. why not? because of “checks and balances”? LOL
you have about 2 months to prepare your asshole
deleted by creator
and we’re leaving out implications at the local level. why would a trumper sheriff bother going after someone for murdering marginalized peoples? why would any lawyer take up any case against a trump appointed judge (spoiler alert: it’ll be all of them, soon)?
Abbott already pardoned some shitbag for murder because he was a conservative who murdered a liberal.
Like Biden or Kamala wouldn’t do the same with active support of genocide in Gaza.
Red or Blue - certain things remain.
deleted by creator
Or could it be that your leadership and policies are seen as poor, uninspiring, and indistinguishable from the opposition amongst those that you refer to as “children or dogs?”
Kamala, probably, would have been less harmful than Trump.
But not in regard to assisting genocide of Palestinians.
Didn’t you hear? Trump won, nobody will have to worry about a Palestinian genocide much longer.
Oh yeah it really seems like Israel has been holding back over the last 13 months. The ethnic cleansing is about to get so much cleansinger!
Also, remember that this follows HOT on the heels of SCOTUS saying “basically anything a President does is legal”. This theoretically means Trump and his admin could sidestep Congress entirely, on anything. Trump was already ruling by EO last term, but I suspect we haven’t seen anything yet.
Kinda makes you wonder why Joe Biden didn’t take advantage of that at any point over the last several months when so much is at stake.
There can’t be checks and balances when both are in the same hand.
There are plenty of checks and balances. People write the checks, other people apply them to their balances.
😘👌
There’s actually so much at stake that I lost track of it all. Absolutely mind blowing that a single American could vote for him let alone the majority. I do not understand why Americans hate America.
just read up on 1930s germany
Is this what he did in previous term ?
Mass imprisonment and assassinations?
Yes.