• NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “I’m happy to trace this issue back to the founding fathers, but Bush v Gore was the beginning of the end in my opinion.”

    I share similar sentiments except with Citizens United V FEC instead of Bush V Gore. I can’t imagine any meaningful change without removing private money from politics and I don’t see how anyone can realistically remove private money when it’s ruled to be protected by the first amendment…The only avenues I can think of involve packing the court or passing a constitutional amendment. Packing the court would require only slightly less cooperation from congress than an Amendment.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I hate to stress a point, but Bush v Gore was 2000, and Bush elected two Supreme Court judges that would then go on to decide citizens United under a Bush appointed chief justice.

      I don’t know if things definitely would’ve gone differently, but I imagine there would at least be different judges in place.