Pretty much the only thing I think AI could be useful for - forecasting the weather based off tracking massive amounts of data. I look forward to seeing how this particular field of study is improved.

Bonus points, AI weather modeling, for once, saves energy relative to physics models. Pair it with some sort of light weight physical model to keep the hallucinations at bay, and you’ve got a good combo.

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 days ago

    Yeah, I’ve long thought that weather forecasts are a perfect use case for AI. AI is great with complicated systems that are hard to model accurately but have lots of available data.

    Current weather forecasts kinda suck. I try to schedule jobs around when it’s going to rain, and have to frequently reschedule because rain forecasts aren’t very accurate. I really hope we can see improvements.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      It would be amazing if it could have a significant impact on spatial and temporal accuracy of things like rain. I feel like for me the existing weather report is good enough for “it will probably rain tomorrow” but it’s really hit-or-miss when you get to hourly resolution. A good model may be able to go so far as to say “it will probably rain between 3-4pm on the east side of town tomorrow, and 2-3pm on the west side”

      That’s the dream at least. With enough data and a sophisticated enough model it feels like it could be possible.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’m not convinced you can ever get that resolution. There’s a big difference between modeling the broad trends and trying to remove the uncertainty from a process that’s inherently probabilistic.

        • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Theoretically with enough data it could predict exactly what is going to happen do we have enough data currently to do that probably not but weather isn’t just completely random we just don’t understand it enough yet

          • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            My argument is that that is not the case.

            There are many systems in nature that have randomness fundamentally built in. You can model the broad strokes, but the low level details are inherently unpredictable because random processes are involved at the low level. You can predict the general pattern of airflow over a jet wing, but it’s not a lack of input resolution that makes it impossible to project the path of a specific molecule.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Rain forecasts are mostly spot on for me. Keep in mind, %chance of rain is covering a wide area. If we want better rain forecasts we have to dial in the resolution.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I had one time a couple weeks ago where I was scheduling jobs on Monday, we were supposed to be rained out Tuesday, light/scattered showers Wednesday, and heavy rain Thursday.

        Actual results was no rain Tuesday, absolute downpour on Wednesday, and sunny Thursday and Friday.