The agency now believes “with low confidence” that Covid-19 likely came from a lab leak

I shared the RT article instead of other articles, because other articles are really biased and act like this CIA assessment is the truth. While this article put in the first paragraph the “low confidence” part and actually talk about the factors that may affected it. Which is quiet telling about the shitty quality of journalism currently.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      The kind that shows when your source is already ridiculously biased and also very bigoted, expecting someone to even give any of the articles the time of day just in case there are no errors or biased reporting is just silly.

      RT is highly biased and very bigoted.
      Stormfront is highly biased and very bigoted.

      Are some of their articles factually accurate? Possibly. Why should anyone give them the attention?

      • 000@reddthat.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        So…what is your point here exactly?

        You did not show any problems in the article, what are you looking for here exactly?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          My point is you are using a highly biased and bigoted source. Hence my saying you are using a highly biased and bigoted source.

          What I am looking for is someone not willing to give bigots page views. Sadly, that is not you. You’re fine with promoting the bigots because you’ve decided one of their articles is bias-free. Which makes me wonder what your own feelings are about things like queer people and Ukrainians are.

          Edit: also, Holocaust denial. RT pushes that too. Huh… Just like Stormfront!