• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It is because a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn’t accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      If your argument is that it depends on the quality of the output, then I definitely shouldn’t be allowed to look at art or read books.

    • mimavox@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s where I don’t agree. I don’t subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are “stochastic parrots”.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        What do you think they are if not that?

        They don’t have emotions, they don’t have individual motivations, and don’t have intent.

        • mimavox@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          No. But I do think they mimick the language capacity in the human brain.