return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 8 days agoThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down14
arrow-up1449arrow-down1external-linkThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 days agoReasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
minus-squareqprimed@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agooh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup. as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
minus-squareidiomaddict@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoTo be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
minus-squaresome_designer_dude@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·8 days agoIntelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.
Reasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
oh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup.
as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
To be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
Intelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.