return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agoThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down14
arrow-up1449arrow-down1external-linkThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoReasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
minus-squareqprimed@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agooh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup. as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
minus-squareidiomaddict@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoTo be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
minus-squaresome_designer_dude@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoIntelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.
Reasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
oh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup.
as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
To be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
Intelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.