Sensitive subjects.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/6745228

TLDR: Apple wants to keep china happy, Stewart was going after china in some way, Apple said don’t, Stewart walked, the show is dead.

Not surprising at all, but sad and shitty and definitely reduces my loyalty to the platform. Hosting Stewart seemed like a real power play from Apple, where conflict like this was inevitable, but they were basically saying, yes we know, but we believe in things and, as a big company with deep pockets that can therefore take risks, to prove it we’re hosting this show.

Changing their minds like this is worse than ever hosting the show in the first place as it shows they probably don’t know what they’re doing or believe in at all, like any big company, and just going for what seems cool, and undermining the very idea of a company like Apple running a streaming platform. I wonder if the Morning Show/Wars people are paying close attention.

  • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    52·
    1 year ago

    another reminder that apple’s “privacy, that’s iPhone” is a marketing gimmick. they profit from surveillance and censorship in China1. elsewhere, this catchphrase has allowed them to suck Facebook’s as revenue into their growing ad business, surpassing even tiktok in terms of ad revenue2.

    they’ll happily do pink washing, but will try everything do dilute labour rights3.

    so, apple is just your average big tech. nothing exceptional about them(except for them suing regular people to oblivion4).

    in case of hitting a paywall, either disable JavaScript, or use bypass paywalls clean.
    1: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-censorship-data.html
    2: https://finshots.in/archive/apple-is-an-advertising-giant-almost/
    3: a simple search result would lead you to many such cases: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apple+labour+rights&ia=web
    4: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/11/technology/apple-trademarks.html

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      111·
      1 year ago

      They were so close to implementing on-device scanning last year it’s scary. The number of people who supported it because Apple promised to only use it for child sexual exploitation material really shocked me. “Think of the children” really does have a way of making people’s brains short circuit.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        It was a lot longer ago, like 2.5 to 3 years ago, but that’s pedantic.

        My own father was shocked that they’d do that (his death is how I know the timeline; no sympathy required, I’ve dealt with it, it happens). He really respected them, primarily through my respect of them and excitedness about their tech. He was blown away that they’d even consider such a thing. He just couldn’t calculate how such a misstep could happen. I can, but what a mistake that was.

        I’ve seen an argument that this could have been a calculated risk to prevent attacks when they enabled increased encryption. I don’t think it was that, even if that was the resulting effect. They are too protective of their brand to deliberately take a hit.