• david@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why can’t you use it? Because your web designer isn’t designing for the possibility that people use a phone to access the Web, but it’s not 2004 any more and they’re living in the past.

    You showed your colours when you assumed that portrait video is of lower quality. It’s only of lower quality if you’ve padded it out and are watching it on a landscape screen!

    Technology to detect whether your webpage is being viewed landscape has existed for a long time, and takes very simple calculations indeed or just a splash or two of css to maximise the video size for whatever screen it’s being viewed on. It’s design laziness and wasted bandwidth to put the silly blurry bars or even black bars down the side of the video. But don’t force landscape on everyone. Smart phones aren’t new and they aren’t going away.

    I suspect that the majority of people who spend even a tiny bit more than half of their recreational screen time looking at a fixed landscape screen are well over thirty.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I never said it’s lower quality. Not once.

        No? This you?

        we kept everything to a certain standard of quality. Vertical videos are not suitable for anything except a phone.

        Totally not lower quality. Definitely not. There’s a full stop and everything. No link whatsoever. My bad.

        No one said anything about websites.

        Well I think the rest of us are discussing a video on bbc.co.uk, which is a website, and we’re doing it on lemmy.world, which is also a website, and when I complained about people making portrait videos landscape, I suspect most people correctly figured out that I meant on websites, so I really think it’s just you that assumes we’re talking about jeep club.