• ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an aside, it reminds me of when I thought my Galaxy Note 2 had a massive display at 5.5 inches. Fast forward to 2023 and I’m kind of wishing my S23 Ultra were a bit larger despite measuring 6.8 inches diagonally.

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the differences in the aspect ratio. You cannot compare screen sizes based on the diagonal alone when the aspect ratios are different. A 6.0" 20:9 screen is smaller than a 5.7" 16:9 screen. And in terms of width, the 6.5" 20:9 screen is also less wide than the 5.7" 16:9 screen, which can matter for certain things (like typing).

      Also what’s not helping is the curved screen, I find it takes another few mm off in terms of usable screen area, which makes a screen feel smaller than its stated dimensions.

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really like the longer aspect ratios. My current phone with a 6" 18:9 display is just minimally wider than my old 5" 16:9. Same comfort in the hand with more screen.

        The only gripe I have with completely edge-less displays is the front facing camera. Small teardrop notches or holepunch cameras make it harder to cover them without it looking bad and/or obstructing part of the statusbar.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          While I realize that there are people for whom having a camera aimed at themselves is really important, I have to say that I have virtually never used the self-facing camera on a phone.

          Honestly, every videoconference I’ve ever done on a computer for work could have really been done just fine with a audio-only call too.

          I’d be pretty comfortable getting a phone that just drops the self-facing camera. Could just use a USB-attached webcam if I ever ran into a very rare situation where I really critically wanted the ability to videoconference on a phone.

          Now, okay, that’s not true for everyone. For some people’s uses, having a self-facing camera is legitimately important. But at least for my own uses, I’d rather just have the extra pixels.

          • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t have much use for it either, but every now and then it’s nice to actually see the person you’re talking to. A grandkids-living-abroad type situation, for example.

          • HidingCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My work needs it every now and then, and due to the nature of it (I’m not office-bound all the time), being able to have it on the phone is useful. I’d rather have a front-facing camera than not.

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do have a Galaxy tablet that seems huge to me and I was amazed to find it has better sound and video quality than my TV lol