Let’s pause — I would like to reflect on this incredible phrase, about an asset class that democratizes access to events as they unfold. See, I thought we all had access to the events of the election because we all exist in reality and can find out about them. But apparently, if we can’t gamble on an event, it isn’t happening. This is a fascinating vision of metaphysics, and I would like to hear more about it. No one bet on my birth, for instance, and thus there is no asset class relating to my existence. So am I real?

that’s a… specific… instance name…

it makes sense!

yeah i understand that (in fact that’s kinda what i said in another comment). i’m making the case for why the time limit needs to be 60 seconds. you can already filter 10min videos in normal video platforms iirc

i don’t think it’s working

the idea is that you just watch them when you have a tiny gap to kill (and thus you become addicted)

As a Chinese person, no. Chinese version is just censored more. Both are good as far as format goes.

i like cringe dance videos but i think the problem’s gonna be the volume

Nearly all social media apps teenagers use accept such ads, BeReal is just cheaper because it has less users.

Full swing is a stock company, where companies are required by law to seek short-term gain instead of long-term.

BlueSky is still a private corporation.

…what’s wrong with that?

Yes? Obviously it’s way less than ideal but it’s still federation

accidental repost

because for some reason, torvalds is bad now because he is a capitalist while nearly everyone is a capitalist. that’s the argument made.

making my tone proper in emails

ehhhh probably not within the decade

I’m done explaining.

(Internet slang, derogatory) An effeminate or unmasculine man.

A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]