Feel free to correct me as I see other comments saying the same thing, but I don’t believe Google wants you to spend a lot of time reviewing a specific search result.

They don’t have refreshing display or video ads where time on site really makes a difference. They want you to click on a sponsored result, which is a paid action worth way more than a viewed impression.

I was the same until I was actively looking for another job. I wanted to ability to provide an instant read/response.

Yeah this is interesting. I might ask a manager about this on my next trip.

I went from an 07 Escape to a 2023 RAV4. The thing just won’t shut the fuck up. Mike any kinda of parking the detection beeps. Console software is annoying.

Miss my relatively dumb car.

If they are trying to monetize popular NSFW subs they cannot monetize with ads, a paywall would probably just kill the engagement.

If they are trying to compete with OnlyFans and rev share with the sub creator I could maybe see that working.

Silver Nissan does it again!

What would you use this feature for?

I don’t see how it could be enforced without this. If you are operating internationally, comply or block your service from regions you cannot legally operate in.

Personally I don’t think Lemmy should comply. It’s an ad free community service with zero PII obligation besides an email and whatever IP you choose to connect from. No one has to be on Lemmy for any common social obligations.

If you want to be forgotten then leave!

Scale. It’s a better quality audience but executives like BIG NUMBERS to make the juice worth the squeeze.

I think the investment supporting is worth it in the long run! Traditional social is basically a shitty rev share to reach a larger audience.

Limited view tickets were $1500 a piece when TS came to Levi stadium. Bonkers

Imagining a returning user who previously consented. If non essential cookies changed since their last visit, that user needs to consent again. But in scenario, just auto opt them out? I’m weirdly on the fence between this might be a reasonable block or a violation of GDPR for denying access to users who do not provide consent.

What’s the identifier referenced in the IMDB database? Some kind of unique content id?

I think doing that with programmatic ads would be difficult. Maybe hard coding a specific creative would be feasible.

Are the Rockies normally considered the Midwest?

I would like to imagine a world where site advertising was reasonable. Ad blockers don’t exist, sites advertise 1 or 2 banners at $3-5 CPM and everyone gets paid and consumes content in synchrony. It won’t happen. Advertising is setup for ad blocking audiences and iOS cookieless environments. Everyone else subsidizes by viewing the myriad of placements splattered all over the page.

Randos on Twitter left negative comments with little to no substantive feedback. Fire up the article!

Def #3 appears to describe a Pimp

Sherrifs straddle the line between law enforcement and politician, and their positions often have questionable accountability protocols.

However they are 100% subject to local, state, and federal laws if investigated and charged by any of those bodies.

Years ago I worked for a company that had ads appear on Breitbart. Retargeted display, not a direct buy on the site. People would screenshot the ads and light up our Twitter complaining we were directly supporting hate speech etc, so we asked our demand partner to stop buying there to avoid negative engagement on our social. If your site gets a critical mass of negative attention brands can shut down your ability to be commercially viable, and effectively censor the content in a way.

Kids pasta shells are already $16.25. I don’t think they can raise them any more.