What’s wrong with ThunderBird ?

But it doesn’t appeal to GIT users, Git favours a Bazaar style development

I wasn’t talking about Github, I was talking about GIT itself; <u>Look at these Three</u>:

1. Fossil
2. Pijul
3. Darcs

The last 2 are Patch-Based & 2 is basically a modernized-version of 3, eventhough 3 is still being maintained to this day & 1 is a fully-fledged Github-in-a-box

Oh boy I can’t wait for the negative comments about it’s obviois flaws, so let’s hear it

I tried talking to them about the notion of breaking the monopoly of GIT & was talking about Fossil They literally went don’t care “Git is good enough” they’re literally talentless monkeys

Your computer needs a dose of FREEEEEEDOM

Does FairPhone count as one ?

Thanks, but we SERIOUSLY need more Libre-Games

I’m not a part of the fossil community, also when none of the people here bother to properly check out the website & call it Ancient or see the why behind the tool & it’s development philosphy Yeah that pisses me off (So yeah I’ll “cool it” but it makes the GIT-community look like hostile hive)

There are tabs above like a browser

So Git has a ticketting system ?

Because of Ubuntu we get to have “Just works distros” & Fossil has features Git doesn’t

With that attitude maybe we shouldn’t invent at all Why not go all the way

Yeah & for that we have to deal withe Dependency hell Look at the size of Fossil & compare

It doesn’t have remote/server capabilities for one

Why ? As in the intense dislike ?

I like Markdown so I’m gonna use it

Yeah it’s the cathedral-style, Opensource but closed contributions as in no PRs

& The code behind Linux isn’t ? People back then did some REAL sorcery with coding

Look at the bottom

& does jerboa have any ability to follow Mbin communities ?