Never used Facebook, never fucking will.

Pretty neat, but probably not something I’d buy

Burn it all to the ground

Eh. Until the state does lots of IP blocking of foreign websites outside of their jurisdiction, there will always be a way.

And I’d vote you not guilty.

They really knew what they were doing when they were making the latest season of handmaid’s tale.

If only this could have been predicted. Oh wait, it was.

https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/this-is-not-about-covid19-but-another

It’s never about protecting the unborn, its about punishing and controlling women.

You said intentional.

I’ll grant you that I could have phrased it more clearly, but I was speaking about the 2A for that section:

If that were the case you’d be right. But as of right now, this is the only check on their power. And it is an intentional check. The 2A was put in place to fight tyrants if it came to it, and it is quickly coming to it.

Perhaps, but if it’s ever used to support justice then it’s inevitable that it would also be used to undermine justice.

Yes, which is why it cannot simply be labeled corruption in all cases. It’s dependent on the case it’s used in. It can be used to free somebody from stealing food for their star ijg family, it can be used to let lynchers get away with their horrid actions, and everything in-between.

Why bother having laws if you can simply convene a jury of citizens to determine an appropriate punishment?

Because the majority of the time it isn’t applicable, or used. It’s an edge case.

I said inherent, not intentional.

And it’s not inherently corrupt. It can be used as a check against immoral law, or it can be used to refuse justice to just law. It’s entirely based on the case it’s used in.

Once against proving we have a two tiered justice system.

If the cops did indeed plant evidence then happy days for the defence since it should be easy to disprove. e.g. by simple handwriting analysis or other such means. But this is fantasy wishful thinking since he did write the words. So stick to the reality here

Handwriting analysis is hardly objective.

He shot the guy and confessed to it.

He’s pleaded not guilty, and unless you have more up to date information, he’s made no confession outside of the alleged note.

Who is “they” and how might they “fix” the justice system ?

The oligarchs that own the country.

Are you proposing that allowing a jury of peers drawn from this public ought to be able to make up the law based on the vibe of cases before them ?

I’m proposing that the inherent protections the judicial system gives people be used to protect Luigi.

Justice is dead so long as billionaires can cause immeasurable death and suffering without repercussions.

You’re operating under the incorrect assumption that the public can control the law.

If that were the case you’d be right. But as of right now, this is the only check on their power. And it is an intentional check. The 2A was put in place to fight tyrants if it came to it, and it is quickly coming to it.

He’s pleading not guilty, claiming that the cops planted that shit.

And the cops routinely lie and plant evidence, so it’s not out of the question.

Don’t know what you’re talking about. They clearly have the wrong guy.

Maybe they should fix the justice system if they want juries to actually act like they’re intended to.

But they won’t, billionaires, CEOs, business execs, and other parasites will continue to do what they like and harm who they like with a slap on the wrist at most.

deleted by creator

Good.