Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!
If social media companies exist to collect massive troves of personal info from users–and they do–then there is a valid national security concern over social media controlled by an adversary. This is distinct from the individual privacy concerns towards domestically-controlled social media.
No it’s not. There’s no bail, for example, and no plea bargaining in civil cases; jail time isn’t on the table, the district attorney isn’t involved, the standard of evidence is lower, and the rules of procedure are different.
First comes the discovery phase where both sides exchange evidence and the court settles any evidentiary questions. This phase can frequently take longer than the trial itself.
This is a civil case.
Today, the US is withholding billions of dollars in Afghan assets, cutting off a crucial economic lifeline for the people of Afghanistan.
What assets are they talking about here?
Lisa needs braces!
I’m not upgrading because I don’t trust Windows 11. Not that 10 has my confidence, of course, but 11 seems worse.
The value of the DNS is that we all use the same one. You can declare independence, but you’d lose out on that value.
deleted by creator
Point of order: the Constitution doesn’t set the number of justices, it gives that power to Congress.
That doesn’t seem like a reasonable or well thought-out idea.
What do you suppose the president has the power to do in this case?
The chronically homeless, the ones that are hardest to get off the street, are difficult to house for reasons besides availability or cost, though.
I’m curious what the federal government can actually do in this situation. Most private leases are contracts under state law, not federal law.
Or, 1/50th the death rate of the general US population.
Looks like compatibility hacks for various websites.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Compatibility/UA_Override_&_Interventions_Testing