I’m new here and don’t know what to put in my profile. She/them, living in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

  • 1 Post
  • 35 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle
















  • You seem to know a lot more about ordinance than I do but from what you’re saying, it sounds like tungsten that is not alloyed with thorium would be the way to go!!

    I wish there were more international cooperation on this stuff.

    My parents’ generation all seem to hate benzene and warn us it’s toxic as hell. That’s the only time it seems to come up, might be to do with napalm now that you mention it. Much shorter life and half life I guess.

    For what it’s worth I also think deliberate napalm and white phosphorous use on humans are war crimes as well.

    A couple of years ago Indonesia used white phosphorous on some West Papua villages and the results were horrific.

    Edit, just realised I forgot to answer your first question. I do not recollect the details about the relative proportions of other causes of birth defects etc in that environment but I would argue that a) DU alone definitely earned its place as an unethical weapon and b) any known risk factor with that high a contribution should be phased out too.

    It’s a type of “future eating”.


  • Well no, the article is about weird happenings in the research into this. You have to read actual research to see the evidence.

    I apologize for not providing it here. I’m uncomfortably aware that I sound like one of those annoying trollish people who say Do yOuR oWn ResEarch instead of presenting evidence.

    I read a bunch of research papers on depleted uranium years ago and found it very convincing, and that’s what my opinion is based on, but unfortunately I’m finding google and duckduckgo kind of useless these days (any recs welcome), it’s late at night and I’m tired. @[email protected] if you have anything handy?


  • I get where you’re coming from too. Especially since the Russians appear to have added that to their list of crimes. Fight uranium with uranium.

    I’m very wary of the argument that people can use whatever weapons they like in their own country. War crimes are a thing in international law for good reason.

    I’m a strong supporter of the “court of last resort” the ICC, and I firmly believe that it’s the duty of all the world’s citizens to oppose war crimes, genocides, and crimes against humanity wherever they occur.

    Fighting war crimes with war crimes happens a lot - we have seen it in the past year in Ethiopia as well - but a line has to be drawn somewhere or attrocities keep escalating and everyone becomes monsters.

    For me, that line is here. I appreciate that for you the line might be further along though.


  • The Ukrainian leadership is. But they are not the ones about to be born wirh painful defects.

    To clarify, I am on Ukraine’s side in this war.

    But being on the right side of a war of invasion doesn’t magically turn the Ukrainian military leadership into omniscient saints.

    Depleted Uranium should not be used in any war. Period. If Ukraine is firing it at invaders on Ukrainian soil - and the Russians will be using it too I expect - the legacy is going to be horrendous.