…1/1.56", 65mm…

i mean, just report the lens bore diameter in the same metric units as the focal length already.

In general, the report found that the AI summaries showed “a limited ability to analyze and summarize complex content requiring a deep understanding of context, subtle nuances, or implicit meaning.” Even worse, the Llama summaries often “generated text that was grammatically correct, but on occasion factually inaccurate,”

how is this being accepted? one would have to go through any output with a fine-toothed comb anyway to weed out ai hallucinations, as well as to preserve nuance and context.

it’s like the ai tells you that mona lisa has three eyes and a nose and her mouth is closed but her denim jacket is open. you’re going to report that in your story without ever looking at the painting?

did they really think that a bank – a representative of an industry reknowned for excessively charging for services that should be free – would let them get away with it?

that’s like a lion returning every night to shit in the shikari’s shoes and hoping not to get shot.

yiu do know that, every two seconds, it goes tiktok?

well, just get the sun in your eyes now and you may be surprised to find it’s not a dream.

maybe that’s just the ai’s internal monologue leaking through?

isn’t that headline tautological?

or, alternatively, their lifetime offer has truly been honoured.

even the strongest amongst us would quail

on hearing the specifics of every such tale.

one would be ever so inclined

to declare that the worst of mankind

lives today in that state of israel.

• Goldilocks

one must appreciate the vision and legislation that’s enforced that particular phrasing. it becomes so much more starker – how cavalierly your data is treated.

i would juat have denied that game.

solving global warming is really simple: kill off all human beings.

i wonder how long ai algorithms will take to figure that out.

this article is a load of bollocks;

i really love my smart idiot box!

but wait, this may sound bad,

we interrupt this limerick for an ad –

have you thought of switching to our socks?

one might say that this piece of news is the… canary… in the coal mine?

obligatory mitchell and webb.

why would any of google’s customers pay to stuff its ads into such a broken feature?

it’s like embossing your logo within a toilet bowl – sure, a lot of people will get to see it but mostly only when it’s submerged in shit.

if legislation was to be passed against this book, would it be called the “bye bible bill”?

youtube bermudas.

or build in a return-to-factory-by-yourself feature into them.