• jim3692@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    My question is: even if EU manages to apply laws for backdooring encryption, wouldn’t cybercriminals just use different tools? They may force Signal to backdoor its encryption, but what about Briar? Will they backdoor the Tor network? Will they ban it entirely? What about Matrix? They can’t prevent offshore encrypted instances.

    • Geodad@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Signal said they will just pull out of any country that demands a back door.

      Back doors don’t work. Just ask American telecom companies to talk about how easy it was to get Salt Typhoon out of their back door.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yeah, means Signal would just not have a presence eg an office or local routing/CDN servers in the countries that demand backdoors.

        It would mean slower service for anyone in such countries, but the service would not stop working or become less secure.

        It’s negative either way, as it chips away at the legitimacy of private E2E chat, and legislators the world over seemed determined not to learn that there’s no such think as “backdoors, but just for the good guys”. You either have a resilient end-to-end zero trust encrypted system or you don’t.

        • jim3692@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Would hosting in Albania be a solution? It’s in the Europe continent, but it’s not a member of European Union. UK is also fighting encrypted communications.