Amazon CEO Andy Jassy warns remote workers: ‘It’s probably not going to work out for you’::Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees who defy his edict to return to the office three days a week that “it’s probably not going to work out for you.”

  • 3laws@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not looking good for programers in particular.

    The reason why the can get paid as much as they want is 100% based on you being able to jump ship form company to company without having to wait for a company to find common ground between you and them through a union.

    Sure, they’ll still be hugely compensated but tech companies will keep abusing interns, freelancers. Obviously outsourcing will explode even more than it already has in the last 10 years.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True, but that’s why you do a trade union instead of a company union. And programmers have a lot to gain. These companies, shareholders, and CEOs rake in billions that could be going to employees.

      A programmer will make a feature that saves the company a million dollars and they’ll get paid $100,000 to build it.

      Now is the best time for programmers to unionize. Do it when you already have leverage to make sure the good times stay good. Otherwise, we’ll eventually be as replaceable as drafters are now.

      • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah like AWS was Bezos’ own invention, right? It’s the only thing that brings money in. His idea of the webshop failed miserably and was financed by friends

      • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you mean software engineers? A professional degree is not required but it is mostly software engineers taking the positions. The job title is also software engineer.

          • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s pretty clear you are not part of the industry. Your preference for trade like titles shows you don’t have real world experience in this industry and are just sharing opinions based on your political beliefs with no real basis on reality.

            And if you really are in the industry it’s difficult to believe that you failed to realize that 95%+ are not tradesmen and have profesional degrees in software engineering or something similar.

            • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did he ever say they were Trade Workers? The only time he mentioned Trade that I saw was talking about Trade Unions, which don’t specifically have anything to do with Trade Workers

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Software engineer is a stupid term akin to calling the guy at Subway a “sandwich engineer”. Which even if stupid doesn’t really affect me. But now, half the time anyone says “engineer” it’s for you programmer dudes, and not real engineers. You’ve destroyed job boards and listings.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t buy it. This isn’t the only mechanism, probably not even the most important one, for why salaries are where they are. Shortage of and especially of highly competent programmers is. In fact this actually underpins why jumping ship is even as easy as it is. Uninionization will provide additional leverage, while not diminishing the shortage pressure. Part of the point is that this leverage can substitute the leverage we have due to the current shortage, if and when it diminishes.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason why the can get paid as much as they want is 100% based on you being able to jump ship form company to company without having to wait for a company to find common ground between you and them through a union.

      How strange, were I live there are Unions but when I jump ship I get paid what I want, without waiting for the Union, what do you think a Union is for ?

      The real power of a Union is to let workers to negotiate for a minimum wage level (for example, I cannot be employed for less than a certain wage because it would be illegal to do so) that are reasonable and some basic rights the workers have (for example, no at will employment, a minimum PTO days which are enforced and thing like this).

      True, this has some consequences, mainly companies try to go for the legal minimum, but I would say that it is positive overall

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you get paid $450k with only 5 years of experience? Cuz that’s industry standard rn.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You, within my union, can get paid more than the minimum. There’s nothing against it in the bylaws. Shockingly, very few people are able to individually negotiate higher wages than the minimum. I wonder why that might be?