Modern AI data centers consume enormous amounts of power, and it looks like they will get even more power-hungry in the coming years as companies like Google, Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI strive towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). Oracle has already outlined plans to use nuclear power plants for its 1-gigawatt datacenters. It looks like Microsoft plans to do the same as it just inked a deal to restart a nuclear power plant to feed its data centers, reports Bloomberg.

    • SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      We haven’t solved the “disposal” question of using fossil fuels, and those turned out (or were known along) to cause much bigger problems.

    • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Like most things with environmental impact, we just let later generations deal with it. Somehow.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mostly, yes. Use breeder reactors to turn long term radioactive waste to sort term radioactive waste, store for short time and done. The downside: it’s more expensive to move and process the stuff so nobody wants to do that.

    • Hiko0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Next question would be:

      Who pays for disposal and dismantling old nuclear power plants? Might also be relevant for @[email protected] claim. I guess it‘ll be the tax payer. And then we might have a different answer to the question of financial sense.

      Privatizing gains and collectivizing costs still seems to be en vogue.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Relatively yes. There are disposal sites under construction that are in highly stable and environmentally safe locations. One good thing right now is that radioactive waste is temporarily easily stored. Transport of waste is an issue still, but far less of a problem than transporting oil and oil products.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      We have, but of course not to the satisfaction of anti-nuclear activists because solving it would be counter to their actual goals.

      Nuclear waste is actually quite easy to deal with unless your purposes are best served by it being very difficult to deal with, in which case you make as much trouble as you can for it.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Uh… Yeah. The reactor was in operation until 2019 when it stopped being profitable. Disposal was never a problem.