It started as a stupid project cause I was bored. How much can you actually do without a windowing environment?
After finding out how to post to lemmy from a TTY, I realized that I can do most things I do daily using text.
Browsing the web in links, which opens all sorts of files in the corresponding programs if configured correctly.
Opening images in fbi, PDFs in fbpdf, listening to music in cmus, watching movies in mplayer, using e-mail in alpine, creating documents in vim and latex, …
The only thing that still requires a GUI is image editing and a few websites I need that don’t work without JavaScript.
And it’s actually really nice…more focused, without loading times, animations, popups, ads, or other distractions, and everything is scriptable.

Anyway, sorry for the blog post.

  • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2221·
    1 month ago

    Thatâ™s⠀rea​lly cool. � Ꭰо уо𝗎 𝗍һі𝗇𝗄 уо𝗎’ӏӏ со𝗇𝗍і𝗇𝗎е ᖯ𝗋о𝗐ѕі𝗇𝗀 ӏі𝗄е 𝗍һа𝗍?

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      159·
      1 month ago

      Fuck you, you really made me check on my phone if all my text looks like this :(
      (Your comment showed up “fine”, by the way)

      Yes, I think I will. Not exclusively, of course. But starting Firefox in Wayland just takes a key combo and 5 seconds if needed.

    • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
      39·
      1 month ago

      Not OP, but some of them have non-JS version, in addition to the regular JS version; but yeah, a lot of sites are broken.

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      24·
      1 month ago

      Surprisingly, a lot. And usually they’re the more informative and less commercial ones.
      Most websites that only show a “please enable Javascript” banner I just leave again. Very few I do need, for those I have a key combo that starts a window manager with maximized Firefox on another TTY.

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.clubEnglish
      7·
      1 month ago

      Websites from alternative networks such as Onion, Freenet, I2P and GNUnet, where speed and privacy are a must-have. Onion webchats, for example, uses neverending-loading with iframes/HTML frames (and another frame/iframe with a standard HTML form), so to not depend on JS.

      At the surface web (clearnet), however, it’s harder to find. Even the remaining old sites, from blogosphere and personal tilde websites (those whose URL contained a tilde “~” followed by an username) have some degree of JS.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        5·
        1 month ago

        Even the remaining old sites, from blogosphere and personal tilde websites (those whose URL contained a tilde “~” followed by an username) have some degree of JS.

        Although those websites usually work totally fine without js

      • gerdesj@lemmy.mlEnglish
        10·
        1 month ago

        I doubt it. They make a hell of a noise and print at a rate of characters per second not pages per second. The ribbons suffered from similar issues as cassette tapes (the other ribbons that we had to deal with). The ribbon would dry out if not used for a few days and you’d waste paper and a lot of time.

        DM printers were ideal in the guise of “line printers” - the big old IBM jobbies that munched through A3 landscape fan fold at ridiculous speeds. Home printers like the Epson FX80 or RX80 were at least affordable. I still remember the manual of our RX80 congratulating us on buying it and exhorting me to hug the printer on unpacking it. I suspect the Japanese to English translation might not have been the best.

        We had to get a Centronics interface board stuffed into our C64 and get it working (sacrifice a chicken on a waxing gibbous moon night, etc)

        It worked better on my 80286 box, some years later. I had to set it up in each application - Harvard Graphics, Word Perfect, Super Calc.

        In around 1991 I was able to buy a 80486 based beastie, thanks to gift from granddad. In around 1993 I was given a HP LJ 4P so I could print out proofs for a Plymouth (Devon) tourist tat thing.

        Nowadays I have a fairly elderly HPE MFP five toner humming away at home. Its on a VLAN that doesn’t get to see the internet. It just works. I won’t be “upgrading” it for the foreseeable future.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          3·
          28 days ago

          My mom used to have an epson lx-300+ printer for her small shop, and it was awesome. We printed a lot of stuff and the ribbon lasted for ages. This was my only experience with dot matrix printers, and it was a nice one.

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          3·
          1 month ago

          I think that may have just been a cultural translation issue. I can very much believe the original Japanese text did in fact suggest to hug your printer, especially back then.

    • gerdesj@lemmy.mlEnglish
      5·
      1 month ago

      My Epson RX80’s ribbon is somewhere in landfill. The Commodore 64 however is all good and now sports a USB interface with more storage than the poor thing can possibly ever use. The Quickshot II joystick still works too.

      1984ish was when the C64 was bought by my dad, from the NAAFI in Rheindahlen (West Germany, as was).

      Picture the scene:

      Me and brother fly home from UK to probably Dusseldorf at the end of the winter term. Its December in the mid '80s. Every now and then, Russia sends a Tupolev Bear or Badger to chug along overhead. The US sends a YR-71 over the USSR at multiples of the speed of sound. The Cold War was quite unpleasant to live through. Its quite chilly, snow tyres on the car, chains in the boot. The autobahn has the usual psychotic bunch of lane two and three drivers. Lane one generally runs at around 90mph (yes, even back in the '80s)

      We get to home at the time (we move every two years or so - it is the way of things). Dad shows off the new gadget. He plugs the power lead into the video port.

      Some weeks after we have gone back to school for the spring term, the C64 is returned from the menders. We get to use it in the Easter hols. It travelled to the UK and back to DE several times and also to Cyprus (WSBA). The QS II took a serious battering thanks to Daley Thompson’s decathalon.

      I got it re-capped in 2019, which was all that needed doing. They were rather well made …

  • Trent@lemmy.mlEnglish
    32·
    1 month ago

    I may get hate for this, but… I do this a fair bit because I prefer TUIs for a lot of stuff, and also end up doing a lot of things in emacs because I usually have it open anyway…

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      13·
      29 days ago

      And I understand why some people are fonts enthusiasts, now.

      On the console, you only have 256 colors and 1 font to customize your “desktop”.

  • electricprism@lemmy.ml
    17·
    1 month ago

    Sometimes it’s nice to put the ADHD away and just have simple fucking interfaces without all the stupid distractions.

    This was my exact experience browsing the Social Media on gemini:// – it was glorious how less can actually be more.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    15·
    1 month ago

    image editing

    imagemagick for basic transformations/compression/conversions, CLI (locally hosted) AI for the shops

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      8·
      1 month ago

      yes it only shows the filename of an image. But you can set it up to open images in an external image viewer when you click on it.

        • superkret@feddit.orgOP
          6·
          1 month ago

          Yes. I have absolutely no idea what its purpose or use case is.
          On a TTY, it has no mouse click support. It also has no keyboard navigation support in general. So how am I supposed to navigate websites?
          On a terminal inside a graphical environment it’s completely useless, cause I’m in a graphical environment and can just use Firefox.

          Seriously, if anyone is using Browsh or Carbonyl productively, I’d love to know for what.

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      22·
      1 month ago

      I tried w3m, lynx, links and elinks, which all failed cause they don’t support JavaScript, which is necessary to log in.
      Then I tried Browsh and Carbonyl, which failed cause they both don’t accept mouse clicks in a TTY and offer no keyboard navigation.

      Then I tried Neonmodem Overdrive, a CLI fediverse browser, which I just couldn’t get to show any posts.

      In the end, @[email protected] gave me the hint that some instances have alternative “old-reddit-like” frontends that allow logging in without JavaScript.
      And my home instance with old.feddit.org is one of them. So now I’m using links, cause it’s the most user-friendly text browser IMO.

      • pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org
        3·
        1 month ago

        Not sure if you know, but you can setup links to pipe images (and whatever other media you want) to external programs through the Associations menu.

        Afterwards pressing Enter or I when an image is selected, a new option “open” will appear.

    • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
      16·
      1 month ago

      OP shared the tools they used, you’ve probably missed it.

      - browser - links

      - image viewer - fbi

      - PDFs - fbpdf

      - music - cmus

      - movies -mplayer

      - e-mail - alpine

      - documents - vim, latex

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      10·
      1 month ago

      The default video output device of a Linux TTY is the framebuffer.
      I have no issues viewing images and PDF documents, or watching videos.

  • bruhSoulz@lemmy.mlEnglish
    9·
    1 month ago

    Lol so cool. My fav text apps are toot for mastodon and maybe gomuks or iamb for matrix/element. Also what Lemmy app r u using?

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    7·
    1 month ago

    You get a similar feeling using the console a lot in full screen. It’s just a very peaceful, focused experience.

    • Draghetta@lemmy.world
      7·
      1 month ago

      That’s actually a good point. I’m a TUI guy as much as the next one but I normally use full screen terminal and tmux instead of larping the 90s.

      Deeply respect the hustle - I was also X-free in the early 00s - but I wonder what is the advantage of going raw tty instead of full screen terminal in a wm

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    6·
    1 month ago

    How much can you actually do without a windowing environment? […] Opening images in fbi, PDFs in fbpdf, listening to music in cmus, watching movies in mplayer

    Maybe not an “environment” but it sounds like you’re at least using a window manager. The PDFs and videos, not to mention web browser, are gonna be hard to pull off from a raw shell. [Hard but not that hard, apparently!]

    But that’s a detail. Otherwise I share your enthusiasm, I’ve been doing things this way for a while. Basically: tiling window manager + TUI file manager + scripts which do precisely what I want, if possible in the terminal, if necessary by launching a GUI app. In practice the GUI apps are Firefox, mapping app, and messaging apps.

    The general discovery I made was this: for the small price of foregoing pretty colors and buttons and chrome, you can get a computer to do exactly what you want it to do much quicker. Assuming a willingness to learn a bit of shell scripting, of course.

    For example: I have a button which runs a script with getmail that pulls in my email and then deploys ripmime and weasyprint to convert it to datestamped PDF files, which it dumps with any attachments directly into an inbox folder. In other words, I have made ranger into my email client and I never need to “download” anything, it’s already there.

    And those PDFs I can then manipulate with a bunch of shell scripts that use standard utilities, i.e. to split them, merge them, shrink them, clean them of metadata, even make them look like they come from photocopied paper (dumb bank!). All the stupid shit I once did with 10 manipulations hunting thru menus with a pointer in a fiddly app and always forgetting how it was done. Now I just select the file in the terminal, hit a button and it’s done, I don’t even see the PDF.

    Of course, it’s not for everyone, but this is the promise of free computing.

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      7·
      1 month ago

      No, I’m not using a window manager, X nor Wayland.
      Images, PDFs and video can be rendered on the framebuffer, which has been the standard output for Linux TTY’s for a while now.
      For multitasking, I use tmux, which works a lot like a tiling window manager, but for the text console.

    • NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
      5·
      1 month ago

      The general discovery I made was this: for the small price of foregoing pretty colors and buttons and chrome, you can get a computer to do exactly what you want it to do much quicker. Assuming a willingness to learn a bit of shell scripting, of course.

      I find the emphasis people put on speed interesting, because by far the slowest part of any interaction I have with my computer is caused by me just figuring out what I’m doing next. When I’m functioning at top speed not needing to click around, or say, having the perfect keyboard shortcut, would save me only fractions of a second.

      Actually… to add to this I think the cognitive load of visually navigating is much lower than typing specific things it. I think this is why I find I’d prefer to click around my bookmarks or files to find something than just pull up a “Find” dialog and type something reasonable in.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        3·
        1 month ago

        Fair point about raw speed. I never found the keyboard-vs-mouse speed debate very interesting either.

        But cognitive load is a double-edged sword. Sure, the first time you attempt a task, the abstraction of a GUI is really helpful. There’s nothing to remember, you just point and click around and eventually the task is done. But when you have a task with 7 steps which you have to do every 2 weeks, then the GUI becomes a PITA in my experience. GUIs are all but impossible to script, and so you’re gonna need a good memory if you want to get it done quickly and accurately. This is where CLI scripting becomes genuinely useful. Personally I have quite a few such tasks.

      • superkret@feddit.orgOP
        1·
        29 days ago

        That is exactly the reason why I like the text interface so much. It makes you think about what you want to do next.

        In a graphical environment, there are lots of hints right in front of you what you could do next (made even worse in other OSs that use pop-ups).

        In a text environment, unless you actively do something, all you get is a blinking cursor.

        It increases my productivity and reduces time wasted on the computer, not because it is a bit faster, but because I don’t get distracted.